PEAFX vs. GWPAX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX).
PEAFX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 5, 2015. GWPAX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on May 18, 2012.
Performance
PEAFX vs. GWPAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PEAFX vs. GWPAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 7.99% | 20.25% | 1.14% | 22.28% | -10.71% | 15.47% | 6.43% | 13.30% | -12.77% | 28.91% |
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A | -5.63% | 20.47% | 20.17% | 28.76% | -26.97% | 18.59% | 25.34% | 27.19% | -6.59% | 25.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEAFX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than GWPAX's -5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, PEAFX has underperformed GWPAX with an annualized return of 10.27%, while GWPAX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.87% annualized return.
PEAFX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
GWPAX
- 1D
- 3.37%
- 1M
- -6.92%
- YTD
- -5.63%
- 6M
- -3.30%
- 1Y
- 19.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.31%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PEAFX vs. GWPAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEAFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GWPAX's 0.73% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PEAFX vs. GWPAX — Risk / Return Rank
PEAFX
GWPAX
PEAFX vs. GWPAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEAFX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 1.05 | +0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 1.60 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 1.65 | +0.32 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 6.68 | +1.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEAFX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 1.05 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.42 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.66 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.68 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PEAFX and GWPAX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
PEAFX vs. GWPAX - Dividend Comparison
PEAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than GWPAX's 6.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 2.75% | 2.97% | 1.01% | 4.01% | 11.33% | 9.19% | 7.05% | 2.48% | 11.05% | 8.07% | 2.59% | 0.00% |
GWPAX American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A | 6.09% | 5.75% | 5.83% | 1.61% | 9.94% | 3.42% | 3.42% | 5.77% | 6.19% | 3.39% | 4.36% | 4.84% |
Drawdowns
PEAFX vs. GWPAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.18%, which is greater than GWPAX's maximum drawdown of -34.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEAFX and GWPAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEAFX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.18% | -34.15% | -13.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -11.78% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.57% | -34.15% | +5.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.18% | -34.15% | -13.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.13% | -8.81% | +0.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -5.77% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 2.91% | +0.19% |
Volatility
PEAFX vs. GWPAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) is 5.86%, while American Funds Growth Portfolio Class A (GWPAX) has a volatility of 6.61%. This indicates that PEAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWPAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PEAFX | GWPAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 6.61% | -0.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 11.28% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 18.89% | -3.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 18.17% | -3.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 17.95% | -0.71% |