PEAFX vs. FEMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX).
PEAFX is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jun 5, 2015. FEMSX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 9, 2008.
Performance
PEAFX vs. FEMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PEAFX vs. FEMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 7.99% | 20.25% | 1.14% | 22.28% | -10.71% | 15.47% | 6.43% | 13.30% | -12.77% | 28.91% |
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 5.44% | 37.92% | 7.84% | 14.23% | -23.95% | -5.14% | 24.72% | 28.87% | -16.20% | 49.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PEAFX achieves a 7.99% return, which is significantly higher than FEMSX's 5.44% return. Over the past 10 years, PEAFX has underperformed FEMSX with an annualized return of 10.27%, while FEMSX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.88% annualized return.
PEAFX
- 1D
- 1.39%
- 1M
- -7.03%
- YTD
- 7.99%
- 6M
- 9.51%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 15.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.19%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
FEMSX
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -8.32%
- YTD
- 5.44%
- 6M
- 10.54%
- 1Y
- 38.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.32%
- 5Y*
- 4.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.88%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PEAFX vs. FEMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PEAFX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than FEMSX's 0.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PEAFX vs. FEMSX — Risk / Return Rank
PEAFX
FEMSX
PEAFX vs. FEMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) and Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PEAFX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.70 | 2.08 | -0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.13 | 2.68 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.40 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.97 | 2.89 | -0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.72 | 11.41 | -3.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PEAFX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | 2.08 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.23 | +0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 | 0.57 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.50 | +0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between PEAFX and FEMSX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PEAFX vs. FEMSX - Dividend Comparison
PEAFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, more than FEMSX's 2.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PEAFX PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 2.75% | 2.97% | 1.01% | 4.01% | 11.33% | 9.19% | 7.05% | 2.48% | 11.05% | 8.07% | 2.59% | 0.00% |
FEMSX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund | 2.32% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 2.82% | 2.39% | 12.83% | 2.99% | 2.48% | 9.42% | 8.98% | 1.46% | 1.27% |
Drawdowns
PEAFX vs. FEMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PEAFX drawdown since its inception was -47.18%, which is greater than FEMSX's maximum drawdown of -44.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PEAFX and FEMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PEAFX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.18% | -44.16% | -3.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.14% | -13.42% | +1.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.57% | -41.64% | +13.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.18% | -44.16% | -3.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.13% | -10.35% | +2.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -13.52% | +3.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.10% | 3.40% | -0.30% |
Volatility
PEAFX vs. FEMSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO RAE Emerging Markets Fund Class A (PEAFX) is 5.86%, while Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) has a volatility of 10.41%. This indicates that PEAFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FEMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PEAFX | FEMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.86% | 10.41% | -4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.22% | 14.73% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.52% | 19.16% | -3.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.90% | 18.65% | -3.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.24% | 19.13% | -1.89% |