PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FEMSX vs. AIA
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FEMSX and AIA is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.9

Performance

FEMSX vs. AIA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%250.00%300.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
182.38%
274.44%
FEMSX
AIA

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FEMSX:

0.39

AIA:

0.60

Sortino Ratio

FEMSX:

0.68

AIA:

1.01

Omega Ratio

FEMSX:

1.08

AIA:

1.13

Calmar Ratio

FEMSX:

0.22

AIA:

0.41

Martin Ratio

FEMSX:

1.17

AIA:

2.32

Ulcer Index

FEMSX:

6.21%

AIA:

6.98%

Daily Std Dev

FEMSX:

18.59%

AIA:

27.10%

Max Drawdown

FEMSX:

-48.97%

AIA:

-60.89%

Current Drawdown

FEMSX:

-28.52%

AIA:

-28.73%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FEMSX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly higher than AIA's -2.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FEMSX has underperformed AIA with an annualized return of 2.34%, while AIA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.37% annualized return.


FEMSX

YTD

-0.27%

1M

-7.45%

6M

-6.15%

1Y

7.17%

5Y*

4.11%

10Y*

2.34%

AIA

YTD

-2.15%

1M

-13.60%

6M

-8.82%

1Y

15.79%

5Y*

4.39%

10Y*

4.37%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FEMSX vs. AIA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FEMSX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than AIA's 0.50% expense ratio.


AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
Expense ratio chart for AIA: current value is 0.50%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
AIA: 0.50%
Expense ratio chart for FEMSX: current value is 0.01%, compared with the broader market range of 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%
FEMSX: 0.01%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FEMSX vs. AIA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FEMSX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FEMSX is 5959
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FEMSX is 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FEMSX is 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FEMSX is 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FEMSX is 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FEMSX is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

AIA
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AIA is 6969
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AIA is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AIA is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AIA is 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AIA is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AIA is 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FEMSX vs. AIA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) and iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FEMSX, currently valued at 0.39, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.00
FEMSX: 0.39
AIA: 0.60
The chart of Sortino ratio for FEMSX, currently valued at 0.68, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.00
FEMSX: 0.68
AIA: 1.01
The chart of Omega ratio for FEMSX, currently valued at 1.08, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.00
FEMSX: 1.08
AIA: 1.13
The chart of Calmar ratio for FEMSX, currently valued at 0.22, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
FEMSX: 0.22
AIA: 0.41
The chart of Martin ratio for FEMSX, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0040.0050.00
FEMSX: 1.17
AIA: 2.32

The current FEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the AIA Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FEMSX and AIA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
0.39
0.60
FEMSX
AIA

Dividends

FEMSX vs. AIA - Dividend Comparison

FEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.09%, less than AIA's 2.84% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FEMSX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund
2.09%2.08%2.82%2.39%3.26%1.33%2.41%2.47%1.81%1.24%1.27%0.83%
AIA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
2.84%2.78%2.62%2.59%1.53%1.11%2.24%2.50%1.45%2.29%2.88%2.24%

Drawdowns

FEMSX vs. AIA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FEMSX drawdown since its inception was -48.97%, smaller than the maximum AIA drawdown of -60.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FEMSX and AIA. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-35.00%-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-28.52%
-28.73%
FEMSX
AIA

Volatility

FEMSX vs. AIA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Opportunities Fund (FEMSX) is 9.86%, while iShares Asia 50 ETF (AIA) has a volatility of 14.13%. This indicates that FEMSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
9.86%
14.13%
FEMSX
AIA
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab