PDT vs. TAMBX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PDT (John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund) and TAMBX (JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund) are both mutual funds - PDT is a Dividend fund managed by John Hancock, while TAMBX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, PDT returned 6.12%/yr vs 2.04%/yr for TAMBX. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDT charges 5.06%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for TAMBX.

Performance

PDT vs. TAMBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund (TAMBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDT achieves a 3.84% return, which is significantly higher than TAMBX's 1.41% return. Over the past 10 years, PDT has outperformed TAMBX with an annualized return of 6.12%, while TAMBX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.

PDT

• 1D: -0.39%
• 1M: -2.34%
• YTD: 3.84%
• 6M: 3.30%
• 1Y: 4.47%
• 3Y*: 12.74%
• 5Y*: 2.52%
• 10Y*: 6.12%

TAMBX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.82%
• 1Y: 6.75%
• 3Y*: 4.02%
• 5Y*: 0.79%
• 10Y*: 2.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDT vs. TAMBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund	3.84%	7.64%	29.92%	-9.55%	-16.30%	25.98%	-14.20%	39.29%	-12.49%	21.22%
TAMBX JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund	1.41%	5.25%	2.23%	5.36%	-10.18%	3.05%	4.07%	8.16%	0.14%	5.48%

Correlation

The correlation between PDT and TAMBX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.20
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1991	0.10

The correlation between PDT and TAMBX shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PDT vs. TAMBX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDT

PDT Risk / Return Rank: 7
PDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
PDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
PDT Omega Ratio Rank: 6
PDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
PDT Martin Ratio Rank: 7

TAMBX

TAMBX Risk / Return Rank: 67
TAMBX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
TAMBX Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
TAMBX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
TAMBX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
TAMBX Martin Ratio Rank: 34

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDT vs. TAMBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund (TAMBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PDT	TAMBX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.50	2.71	-2.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	4.46	-3.71
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.70	-0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.83	2.31	-1.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.92	7.60	-5.68
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PDT vs. TAMBX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDT Sharpe Ratio is 0.50, which is lower than the TAMBX Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDT and TAMBX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PDT	TAMBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50	2.71	-2.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15	0.21	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.24	0.51	-0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.31	1.21	-0.89

Drawdowns

PDT vs. TAMBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDT drawdown since its inception was -62.39%, which is greater than TAMBX's maximum drawdown of -15.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDT and TAMBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDT	TAMBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.39%	-15.00%	-47.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.38%	-2.93%	-2.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.06%	-6.65%	-15.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.44%	-14.73%	-25.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.39%	-14.73%	-47.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.11%	-0.73%	-3.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.02%	-2.18%	-7.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.33%	0.89%	+1.44%

Volatility

PDT vs. TAMBX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) has a higher volatility of 3.08% compared to JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund (TAMBX) at 0.92%. This indicates that PDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAMBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDT	TAMBX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.08%	0.92%	+2.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.93%	1.89%	+5.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.93%	2.51%	+6.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.03%	3.82%	+13.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.16%	4.02%	+21.14%

PDT vs. TAMBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDT has a 5.06% expense ratio, which is higher than TAMBX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDT vs. TAMBX - Dividend Comparison

PDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.75%, more than TAMBX's 3.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund	7.75%	7.80%	7.77%	10.14%	9.04%	6.42%	8.43%	6.70%	8.69%	9.94%	9.15%	7.88%
TAMBX JHancock Municipal Opportunities Fund	3.59%	4.39%	3.10%	2.39%	2.47%	2.61%	2.82%	3.37%	3.69%	3.68%	3.79%	3.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDT and TAMBX in my portfolio?

PDT and TAMBX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDT or TAMBX?

PDT has higher volatility (3.08%) compared to TAMBX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDT dropped -62.39% vs TAMBX's -15.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TAMBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.