PDT vs. JVMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX).
PDT is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 14, 1989. JVMIX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Jun 2, 1997.
Performance
PDT vs. JVMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDT vs. JVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 5.12% | 7.64% | 29.92% | -9.55% | -16.30% | 25.98% | -14.20% | 39.29% | -12.49% | 21.22% |
JVMIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I | -0.62% | 11.28% | 10.46% | 16.64% | -7.09% | 26.85% | 5.90% | 30.13% | -14.90% | 15.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDT achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly higher than JVMIX's -0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PDT has underperformed JVMIX with an annualized return of 7.10%, while JVMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.
PDT
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
JVMIX
- 1D
- -0.66%
- 1M
- -8.11%
- YTD
- -0.62%
- 6M
- -1.21%
- 1Y
- 12.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 8.13%
- 10Y*
- 9.92%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDT vs. JVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDT has a 5.06% expense ratio, which is higher than JVMIX's 0.87% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDT vs. JVMIX — Risk / Return Rank
PDT
JVMIX
PDT vs. JVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDT | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 0.74 | -0.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 1.16 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.16 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 0.88 | -0.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 3.65 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDT | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 0.74 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.44 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.49 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.29 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDT and JVMIX is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PDT vs. JVMIX - Dividend Comparison
PDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, less than JVMIX's 9.30% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 7.56% | 7.80% | 7.77% | 10.14% | 9.04% | 6.42% | 8.43% | 6.70% | 8.69% | 9.94% | 9.15% | 7.88% |
JVMIX John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I | 9.30% | 9.24% | 12.05% | 4.02% | 5.27% | 6.67% | 1.13% | 2.40% | 13.85% | 5.94% | 1.91% | 5.88% |
Drawdowns
PDT vs. JVMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDT drawdown since its inception was -62.39%, smaller than the maximum JVMIX drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDT and JVMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDT | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.39% | -67.04% | +4.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -13.22% | +2.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.44% | -21.13% | -19.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.39% | -42.64% | -19.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -8.57% | +5.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -13.43% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 3.20% | -0.53% |
Volatility
PDT vs. JVMIX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) at 3.86%. This indicates that PDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDT | JVMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 3.86% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 9.61% | -2.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 18.06% | -4.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 18.43% | -1.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 20.31% | +4.87% |