PDT vs. AMECX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX).
PDT is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 14, 1989. AMECX is managed by American Funds. It was launched on Dec 1, 1973.
Performance
PDT vs. AMECX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDT vs. AMECX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 5.12% | 7.64% | 29.92% | -9.55% | -16.30% | 25.98% | -14.20% | 39.29% | -12.49% | 21.22% |
AMECX American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A | 1.48% | 17.77% | 10.84% | 6.79% | -6.40% | 17.37% | 4.49% | 18.50% | -5.27% | 12.58% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDT achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly higher than AMECX's 1.48% return. Over the past 10 years, PDT has underperformed AMECX with an annualized return of 7.10%, while AMECX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.21% annualized return.
PDT
- 1D
- 1.87%
- 1M
- -2.93%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 8.08%
- 3Y*
- 10.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.10%
AMECX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -5.74%
- YTD
- 1.48%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 14.19%
- 3Y*
- 11.95%
- 5Y*
- 7.95%
- 10Y*
- 8.21%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDT vs. AMECX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDT has a 5.06% expense ratio, which is higher than AMECX's 0.56% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDT vs. AMECX — Risk / Return Rank
PDT
AMECX
PDT vs. AMECX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) and American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDT | AMECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.61 | 1.55 | -0.94 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 2.13 | -1.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.32 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.84 | 1.71 | -0.87 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 8.01 | -4.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDT | AMECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 | 1.55 | -0.94 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 | 0.85 | -0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.77 | -0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.72 | -0.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDT and AMECX is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PDT vs. AMECX - Dividend Comparison
PDT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, less than AMECX's 9.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDT John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund | 7.56% | 7.80% | 7.77% | 10.14% | 9.04% | 6.42% | 8.43% | 6.70% | 8.69% | 9.94% | 9.15% | 7.88% |
AMECX American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A | 9.86% | 9.94% | 6.38% | 2.93% | 6.98% | 6.67% | 2.80% | 5.01% | 7.48% | 4.26% | 3.09% | 5.09% |
Drawdowns
PDT vs. AMECX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDT drawdown since its inception was -62.39%, which is greater than AMECX's maximum drawdown of -41.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDT and AMECX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDT | AMECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.39% | -41.92% | -20.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.34% | -8.19% | -2.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.44% | -15.78% | -24.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.39% | -26.13% | -36.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.93% | -5.74% | +2.81% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.06% | -4.46% | -5.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.67% | 1.74% | +0.93% |
Volatility
PDT vs. AMECX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) has a higher volatility of 4.21% compared to American Funds The Income Fund of America Class A (AMECX) at 2.94%. This indicates that PDT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMECX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDT | AMECX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.21% | 2.94% | +1.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 5.49% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.21% | 9.48% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.06% | 9.44% | +7.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 10.66% | +14.52% |