PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDP vs. XMVM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDP vs. XMVM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 14.75% return, which is significantly lower than XMVM's 17.44% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PDP having a 12.35% annualized return and XMVM not far ahead at 12.44%.


PDP

1D
0.32%
1M
-5.52%
6M
9.33%
YTD
14.75%
1Y
20.18%
3Y*
18.14%
5Y*
8.11%
10Y*
12.35%
ALL TIME*
9.66%

XMVM

1D
-0.53%
1M
5.11%
6M
13.72%
YTD
17.44%
1Y
38.27%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.44%
ALL TIME*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.96M$3.45M$3.85M
$2.16M$2.04M$1.98M

PDP vs. XMVM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
14.75%8.37%26.06%20.88%-24.49%7.72%36.59%33.13%-5.96%23.30%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
17.44%18.46%11.73%16.31%-8.21%35.15%5.68%30.38%-9.62%2.79%

Correlation

The correlation between PDP and XMVM is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between PDP and XMVM has dropped to 0.41 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

PDP vs. XMVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDP
XMVM

Technology

42.9%
5.1%

Industrials

25.3%
11.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
2.5%

Financial Services

6.0%
37.9%

Energy

4.9%
13.5%

Basic Materials

4.7%
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

2.5%
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

1.3%
1.2%

Communication Services

1.1%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.7%
4.9%

Utilities

0.5%
8.5%

Technology

PDP
42.9%
XMVM
5.1%

Industrials

PDP
25.3%
XMVM
11.7%

Healthcare

PDP
8.4%
XMVM
2.5%

Financial Services

PDP
6.0%
XMVM
37.9%

Energy

PDP
4.9%
XMVM
13.5%

Basic Materials

PDP
4.7%
XMVM
0.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PDP
2.5%
XMVM
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

PDP
1.3%
XMVM
1.2%

Communication Services

PDP
1.1%
XMVM
0.9%

Real Estate

PDP
0.7%
XMVM
4.9%

Utilities

PDP
0.5%
XMVM
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDP vs. XMVM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDP
PDP Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

XMVM
XMVM Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
XMVM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMVM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMVM Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
XMVM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMVM Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDP vs. XMVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDPXMVMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.43

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.03

3.91

-2.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.02

12.52

-8.50

PDP vs. XMVM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDP Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the XMVM Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDP and XMVM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDP vs. XMVM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, smaller than the maximum XMVM drawdown of -62.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and XMVM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDPXMVMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.34%

-62.83%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.58%

-9.18%

-8.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.79%

-24.12%

+0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.91%

-24.12%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.70%

-45.07%

+10.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.80%

-0.71%

-12.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-10.20%

-0.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.51%

2.86%

+1.65%

Volatility

PDP vs. XMVM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a higher volatility of 11.41% compared to Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF (XMVM) at 3.29%. This indicates that PDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XMVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDPXMVMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.41%

3.29%

+8.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.23%

9.25%

+11.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.85%

14.85%

+11.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.80%

21.24%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.01%

22.74%

-0.73%

PDP vs. XMVM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than XMVM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDP vs. XMVM - Dividend Comparison

PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than XMVM's 1.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDP
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF
0.08%0.17%0.15%0.42%0.45%0.00%0.11%0.25%0.18%0.28%0.81%0.39%
XMVM
Invesco S&P MidCap Value with Momentum ETF
1.79%2.07%1.43%1.57%1.76%1.10%1.37%1.73%2.87%2.22%2.27%2.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDP and XMVM have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDP has higher volatility (11.41%) compared to XMVM (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs XMVM's -62.83%.

On 10-year performance, XMVM leads with 12.44% vs 12.35% for PDP. On fees, XMVM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, XMVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.29%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XMVM has performed better with a 12.44% return vs 12.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XMVM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.

XMVM has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.08% for PDP.

PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while XMVM tracks S&P MidCap 400 High Momentum Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.39% for XMVM.

XMVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDP and XMVM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer