PDP vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDP is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PDP returned 11.14%/yr vs 16.11%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PDP charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

PDP vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 27.87% return, which is significantly higher than QQQM's 16.48% return.

PDP

• 1D: -2.83%
• 1M: 6.30%
• YTD: 27.87%
• 6M: 24.23%
• 1Y: 40.34%
• 3Y*: 24.48%
• 5Y*: 11.14%
• 10Y*: 14.14%

QQQM

• 1D: -3.30%
• 1M: -0.42%
• YTD: 16.48%
• 6M: 15.00%
• 1Y: 34.99%
• 3Y*: 26.15%
• 5Y*: 16.11%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDP vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	27.87%	8.37%	26.06%	20.88%	-24.49%	7.72%	8.18%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	16.48%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between PDP and QQQM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.76
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.80
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.81

The correlation between PDP and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDP vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PDP	QQQM
Industrials	40.6%	2.6%
Technology	27.5%	58.7%
Healthcare	6.5%	3.7%
Energy	6.1%	0.5%
Consumer Cyclical	5.6%	11.4%
Financial Services	4.4%	0.2%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	6.4%
Basic Materials	2.4%	1.0%
Communication Services	2.2%	14.3%
Utilities	1.4%	1.2%
Real Estate	1.2%	0.1%

Return for Risk

PDP vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDP

PDP Risk / Return Rank: 59
PDP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
PDP Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
PDP Omega Ratio Rank: 50
PDP Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
PDP Martin Ratio Rank: 69

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 60
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 59
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDP vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PDP	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	1.97	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.34	2.58	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.35	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	2.94	+0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	10.88	+1.15

PDP vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDP Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDP and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PDP vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PDP	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.34%	-35.04%	-24.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.87%	-11.96%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.79%	-22.70%	-1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.91%	-35.04%	+1.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.83%	-4.24%	+1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.58%	-8.20%	-2.38%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.36%	3.22%	+0.14%

Volatility

PDP vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) is 8.05%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 9.00%. This indicates that PDP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PDP	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.05%	9.00%	-0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.09%	14.43%	+3.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.02%	17.85%	+5.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.21%	22.53%	-0.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.69%	22.30%	-0.61%

PDP vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PDP vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than QQQM's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF	0.08%	0.17%	0.15%	0.42%	0.45%	0.00%	0.11%	0.25%	0.18%	0.28%	0.81%	0.39%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.44%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PDP and QQQM in my portfolio?

PDP and QQQM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PDP or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (9.00%) compared to PDP (8.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which ETF is better, PDP or QQQM?

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 16.11% vs 11.14% for PDP. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, PDP has been the lower-risk option at 8.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PDP or QQQM?

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 16.11% return vs 11.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PDP or QQQM?

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PDP or QQQM?

QQQM has the higher dividend yield at 0.44%, compared with 0.08% for PDP.

What is the main difference between PDP and QQQM?

PDP is categorized as Momentum, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.15% for QQQM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.97 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.