PDP vs. EFV
PDP (Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF) and EFV (iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDP is a Momentum fund tracking the Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while EFV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PDP returned 13.75%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for EFV. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PDP charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for EFV.
Performance
PDP vs. EFV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDP achieves a 25.21% return, which is significantly higher than EFV's 10.56% return. Over the past 10 years, PDP has outperformed EFV with an annualized return of 13.75%, while EFV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.55% annualized return.
PDP
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- 25.21%
- 6M
- 24.09%
- 1Y
- 39.29%
- 3Y*
- 23.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.97%
- 10Y*
- 13.75%
EFV
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- YTD
- 10.56%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 29.20%
- 3Y*
- 21.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.36%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
PDP vs. EFV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 25.21% | 8.37% | 26.06% | 20.88% | -24.49% | 7.72% | 36.59% | 33.13% | -5.96% | 23.30% |
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 10.56% | 42.22% | 5.35% | 18.85% | -5.22% | 11.08% | -2.97% | 15.80% | -14.67% | 21.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDP and EFV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2007 | 0.69 |
The correlation between PDP and EFV shifts across timeframes, from 0.54 (1 year) to 0.69 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PDP vs. EFV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDP
EFV
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Industrials
PDP
EFV
Technology
PDP
EFV
Healthcare
PDP
EFV
Energy
PDP
EFV
Consumer Cyclical
PDP
EFV
Financial Services
PDP
EFV
Consumer Defensive
PDP
EFV
Basic Materials
PDP
EFV
Communication Services
PDP
EFV
Utilities
PDP
EFV
Real Estate
PDP
EFV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDP vs. EFV — Risk / Return Rank
PDP
EFV
PDP vs. EFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) and iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDP | EFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.34 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.18 | 2.55 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.21 | 9.40 | +1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDP vs. EFV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDP drawdown since its inception was -59.34%, smaller than the maximum EFV drawdown of -63.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDP and EFV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDP | EFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.34% | -63.94% | +4.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.87% | -10.90% | -0.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.79% | -13.72% | -10.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.91% | -25.84% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.70% | -43.16% | +8.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.24% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.59% | -14.81% | +4.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.36% | 2.96% | +0.40% |
Volatility
PDP vs. EFV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF (PDP) has a higher volatility of 7.89% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF (EFV) at 4.62%. This indicates that PDP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDP | EFV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.89% | 4.62% | +3.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.31% | 11.98% | +6.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.72% | 14.58% | +8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.15% | 16.02% | +6.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.66% | 17.85% | +3.81% |
PDP vs. EFV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDP has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than EFV's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDP vs. EFV - Dividend Comparison
PDP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, less than EFV's 3.76% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFV iShares MSCI EAFE Value ETF | 3.76% | 4.16% | 4.66% | 4.36% | 4.17% | 4.07% | 2.42% | 4.62% | 4.56% | 3.56% | 3.28% | 3.59% |
PDP Invesco Dorsey Wright Momentum ETF | 0.11% | 0.17% | 0.15% | 0.42% | 0.45% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 0.25% | 0.18% | 0.28% | 0.81% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDP and EFV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDP has higher volatility (7.89%) compared to EFV (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDP dropped -59.34% vs EFV's -63.94%.
On 10-year performance, PDP leads with 13.75% vs 10.55% for EFV. On fees, EFV is cheaper at 0.31% per year. On volatility, EFV has been the lower-risk option at 4.62%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, PDP has performed better with a 13.75% return vs 10.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EFV is cheaper with a 0.31% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for PDP.
EFV has the higher dividend yield at 3.76%, compared with 0.11% for PDP.
PDP is categorized as Momentum, while EFV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. PDP tracks Dorsey Wright Technical Leaders Index, while EFV tracks MSCI EAFE Value Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for PDP and 0.31% for EFV.
EFV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDP and EFV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer