PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDN vs. QQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDN vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDN achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly lower than QQQ's 21.30% return. Over the past 10 years, PDN has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 8.41%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 21.94% annualized return.


PDN

1D
-0.74%
1M
0.91%
YTD
10.22%
6M
12.61%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
18.02%
5Y*
6.42%
10Y*
8.41%

QQQ

1D
-0.26%
1M
10.60%
YTD
21.30%
6M
19.66%
1Y
41.82%
3Y*
28.78%
5Y*
17.97%
10Y*
21.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDN vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
10.22%38.34%0.57%13.35%-17.35%9.03%10.65%19.17%-18.38%30.74%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
21.30%20.77%25.58%54.86%-32.58%27.42%48.62%38.96%-0.13%32.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PDN and QQQ is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2007

0.65

The correlation between PDN and QQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDN vs. QQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDN
QQQ

Industrials

22.4%
2.8%

Financial Services

11.4%
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

11.1%
12.3%

Technology

10.3%
53.8%

Basic Materials

10.0%
1.1%

Real Estate

8.6%
0.1%

Healthcare

5.4%
4.2%

Energy

5.1%
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.7%
7.7%

Communication Services

3.3%
15.8%

Utilities

2.4%
1.4%

Industrials

PDN
22.4%
QQQ
2.8%

Financial Services

PDN
11.4%
QQQ
0.2%

Consumer Cyclical

PDN
11.1%
QQQ
12.3%

Technology

PDN
10.3%
QQQ
53.8%

Basic Materials

PDN
10.0%
QQQ
1.1%

Real Estate

PDN
8.6%
QQQ
0.1%

Healthcare

PDN
5.4%
QQQ
4.2%

Energy

PDN
5.1%
QQQ
0.6%

Consumer Defensive

PDN
4.7%
QQQ
7.7%

Communication Services

PDN
3.3%
QQQ
15.8%

Utilities

PDN
2.4%
QQQ
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDN vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDN
PDN Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PDN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDN Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
PDN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDN Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
QQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
QQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDN vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDNQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.45

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

3.51

-1.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

13.49

-3.85

PDN vs. QQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDN Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDN and QQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDNQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.64

-0.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.81

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.99

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.41

-0.14

Drawdowns

PDN vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDN drawdown since its inception was -59.32%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDN and QQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDNQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.32%

-82.97%

+23.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.26%

-11.96%

+0.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

-22.77%

+9.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.68%

-35.12%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.94%

-35.12%

-6.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.62%

-0.26%

-2.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.59%

-32.79%

+21.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

3.11%

-0.23%

Volatility

PDN vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF (PDN) has a higher volatility of 4.74% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 4.49%. This indicates that PDN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDNQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

4.49%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.11%

12.10%

+0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.61%

15.94%

-1.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.34%

22.38%

-6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.06%

22.29%

-5.23%

PDN vs. QQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDN has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQ's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDN vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

PDN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, more than QQQ's 0.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDN
Invesco FTSE RAFI Developed Markets ex-U.S. Small-Mid ETF
3.08%3.36%3.36%3.16%2.68%2.42%1.79%2.60%2.21%2.42%2.16%2.06%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ ETF
0.38%0.45%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDN and QQQ have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDN has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to QQQ (4.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDN dropped -59.32% vs QQQ's -82.97%.

On 10-year performance, QQQ leads with 21.94% vs 8.41% for PDN. On fees, QQQ is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, QQQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QQQ has performed better with a 21.94% return vs 8.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQ is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PDN.

PDN has the higher dividend yield at 3.08%, compared with 0.38% for QQQ.

PDN is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while QQQ is Nasdaq-100. PDN tracks FTSE RAFI Developed x US Mid/Small, while QQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for PDN and 0.18% for QQQ.

QQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDN and QQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer