PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDIZX vs. LTSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDIZX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDIZX achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly lower than LTSTX's 4.65% return.


PDIZX

1D
-0.35%
1M
1.43%
YTD
4.33%
6M
4.91%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
12.40%
5Y*
6.12%
10Y*

LTSTX

1D
-0.52%
1M
1.41%
YTD
4.65%
6M
4.87%
1Y
12.86%
3Y*
12.14%
5Y*
5.43%
10Y*
8.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDIZX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PDIZX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund
4.33%11.93%8.54%18.82%-14.27%12.07%11.36%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
4.65%12.16%11.91%13.30%-15.23%10.91%13.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PDIZX and LTSTX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2020

0.95

The correlation between PDIZX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDIZX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDIZX
PDIZX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PDIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PDIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

LTSTX
LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDIZX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDIZXLTSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.38

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.40

2.52

+0.88

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.38

11.37

+4.02

PDIZX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDIZX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDIZXLTSTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

1.98

+0.52

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.59

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.48

+0.26

Drawdowns

PDIZX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDIZX drawdown since its inception was -21.03%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDIZX and LTSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDIZXLTSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.03%

-48.17%

+27.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

-5.24%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.31%

-8.12%

+0.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.97%

-21.01%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.35%

-0.52%

+0.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-6.16%

+1.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.16%

-0.29%

Volatility

PDIZX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund (PDIZX) is 1.70%, while Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that PDIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDIZXLTSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

2.09%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.25%

5.40%

-1.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.39%

6.66%

-1.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.62%

9.18%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.46%

9.82%

+0.64%

PDIZX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDIZX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDIZX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

PDIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.31%, less than LTSTX's 11.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
11.65%12.19%9.74%4.26%8.00%7.66%5.25%6.91%6.39%4.75%3.65%8.91%
PDIZX
Putnam Retirement Advantage 2030 Fund
7.31%7.63%4.91%3.15%7.76%12.48%1.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, PDIZX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTSTX has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to PDIZX (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDIZX dropped -21.03% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

PDIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDIZX and LTSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer