PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDGIX vs. AOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDGIX vs. AOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PDGIX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDGIX achieves a 7.64% return, which is significantly higher than AOM's 4.75% return. Over the past 10 years, PDGIX has outperformed AOM with an annualized return of 13.06%, while AOM has yielded a comparatively lower 6.31% annualized return.


PDGIX

1D
1.34%
1M
2.48%
YTD
7.64%
6M
7.36%
1Y
16.36%
3Y*
15.48%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
13.06%

AOM

1D
0.04%
1M
0.49%
YTD
4.75%
6M
5.32%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
10.66%
5Y*
4.66%
10Y*
6.31%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDGIX vs. AOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDGIX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund
7.64%14.91%13.63%13.82%-10.08%26.19%14.06%31.90%-0.93%18.98%
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
4.75%13.28%7.95%12.38%-14.54%6.93%10.02%15.58%-3.88%11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between PDGIX and AOM is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.80

The correlation between PDGIX and AOM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDGIX vs. AOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDGIX
PDGIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PDGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PDGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

AOM
AOM Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AOM Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
AOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
AOM Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDGIX vs. AOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PDGIX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDGIXAOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.31

2.52

-0.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.42

10.84

-1.42

PDGIX vs. AOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDGIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the AOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDGIX and AOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDGIX vs. AOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDGIX drawdown since its inception was -33.17%, which is greater than AOM's maximum drawdown of -19.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDGIX and AOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDGIXAOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.17%

-19.96%

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.32%

-5.11%

-2.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.12%

-6.85%

-7.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.21%

-19.96%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.17%

-19.96%

-13.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.70%

+0.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.35%

-2.70%

-0.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

1.19%

+0.60%

Volatility

PDGIX vs. AOM - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund (PDGIX) and iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF (AOM) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDGIXAOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.82%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.79%

5.63%

+2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.94%

6.90%

+3.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.09%

8.19%

+5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.88%

7.96%

+7.92%

PDGIX vs. AOM - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDGIX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than AOM's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDGIX vs. AOM - Dividend Comparison

PDGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, more than AOM's 2.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AOM
iShares Core Moderate Allocation ETF
2.99%2.98%3.10%2.79%2.27%1.56%2.02%2.66%2.53%3.31%2.14%1.98%
PDGIX
T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund
7.66%8.16%4.80%2.90%3.99%2.09%1.15%2.44%3.81%1.89%3.20%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDGIX and AOM have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PDGIX has higher volatility (2.85%) compared to AOM (2.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDGIX dropped -33.17% vs AOM's -19.96%.

AOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDGIX and AOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer