PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDEC vs. POCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDEC vs. POCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDEC achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly higher than POCT's 5.33% return.


PDEC

1D
-0.22%
1M
2.25%
YTD
5.69%
6M
6.10%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
12.39%
5Y*
8.60%
10Y*

POCT

1D
-0.20%
1M
2.01%
YTD
5.33%
6M
5.92%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.17%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDEC vs. POCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December
5.69%12.91%9.46%17.43%-5.95%9.59%8.45%1.58%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
5.33%11.00%9.54%20.12%-1.26%9.46%10.40%1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PDEC and POCT is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2019

0.85

The correlation between PDEC and POCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

PDEC vs. POCT - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDEC
POCT

Technology

36.2%
36.2%

Financial Services

11.9%
11.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.1%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.4%

Industrials

8.1%
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.5%

Utilities

2.3%
2.3%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

PDEC
36.2%
POCT
36.2%

Financial Services

PDEC
11.9%
POCT
11.9%

Communication Services

PDEC
10.9%
POCT
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PDEC
10.1%
POCT
10.1%

Healthcare

PDEC
8.4%
POCT
8.4%

Industrials

PDEC
8.1%
POCT
8.1%

Consumer Defensive

PDEC
4.9%
POCT
4.9%

Energy

PDEC
3.5%
POCT
3.5%

Utilities

PDEC
2.3%
POCT
2.3%

Real Estate

PDEC
1.9%
POCT
1.9%

Basic Materials

PDEC
1.8%
POCT
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDEC vs. POCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDEC
PDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
PDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

POCT
POCT Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
POCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
POCT Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
POCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
POCT Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDEC vs. POCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PDECPOCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.47

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

3.28

+0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.75

16.84

+1.91

PDEC vs. POCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the POCT Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDEC and POCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDECPOCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.35

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

1.24

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

0.87

-0.06

Drawdowns

PDEC vs. POCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDEC drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, roughly equal to the maximum POCT drawdown of -18.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEC and POCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDECPOCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.31%

-18.80%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.78%

-4.40%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.77%

-10.22%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.53%

-10.22%

-1.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-0.20%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-1.50%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

0.86%

+0.06%

Volatility

PDEC vs. POCT - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October (POCT) at 0.94%. This indicates that PDEC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than POCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDECPOCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.94%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.94%

4.77%

+0.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.75%

6.17%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.90%

7.94%

+0.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.96%

10.22%

+0.74%

PDEC vs. POCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PDEC and POCT have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Dividends

PDEC vs. POCT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PDEC nor POCT has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
PDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
POCT
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF October
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%2.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, PDEC and POCT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PDEC has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to POCT (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEC dropped -19.31% vs POCT's -18.80%.

On 5-year performance, POCT leads with 9.82% vs 8.60% for PDEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, POCT has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, POCT has performed better with a 9.82% return vs 8.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PDEC and POCT have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

PDEC and POCT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

PDEC tracks S&P 500, while POCT tracks Cboe S&P 500 15% Buffer Protect October Series Index.

PDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDEC and POCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer