PDEC vs. KSEP
PDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December) and KSEP (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. PDEC is passively managed, while KSEP is actively managed. Over the past year, PDEC returned 17.23% vs 20.63% for KSEP. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.
Performance
PDEC vs. KSEP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDEC achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than KSEP's 8.77% return.
PDEC
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 2.25%
- YTD
- 5.69%
- 6M
- 6.10%
- 1Y
- 17.23%
- 3Y*
- 12.39%
- 5Y*
- 8.60%
- 10Y*
- —
KSEP
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 8.77%
- 6M
- 8.72%
- 1Y
- 20.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDEC vs. KSEP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December | 5.69% | 12.91% | 1.35% |
KSEP Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September | 8.77% | 8.54% | 3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDEC and KSEP is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024 | 0.74 |
The correlation between PDEC and KSEP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDEC vs. KSEP — Risk / Return Rank
PDEC
KSEP
PDEC vs. KSEP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDEC | KSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.37 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.62 | 4.36 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.75 | 15.77 | +2.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDEC | KSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 2.04 | +0.52 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.97 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.03 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
PDEC vs. KSEP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDEC drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, which is greater than KSEP's maximum drawdown of -14.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEC and KSEP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDEC | KSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.31% | -14.92% | -4.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.78% | -4.75% | -0.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.53% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.28% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -2.45% | +0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | 1.31% | -0.39% |
Volatility
PDEC vs. KSEP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) is 1.09%, while Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) has a volatility of 1.63%. This indicates that PDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KSEP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDEC | KSEP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.09% | 1.63% | -0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.94% | 6.27% | -1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.75% | 10.16% | -3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.90% | 11.65% | -2.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.96% | 11.65% | -0.69% |
PDEC vs. KSEP - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PDEC and KSEP have an expense ratio of 0.79%.
Dividends
PDEC vs. KSEP - Dividend Comparison
Neither PDEC nor KSEP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
PDEC and KSEP have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KSEP has higher volatility (1.63%) compared to PDEC (1.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEC dropped -19.31% vs KSEP's -14.92%.
On 1-year performance, KSEP leads with 20.63% vs 17.23% for PDEC. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, PDEC has been the lower-risk option at 1.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, KSEP has performed better with a 20.63% return vs 17.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PDEC and KSEP have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.
PDEC and KSEP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
PDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.57 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDEC and KSEP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer