KSEP vs. KJUL

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

KSEP (Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September) and KJUL (Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. KSEP is actively managed, while KJUL is passively managed. Over the past year, KSEP returned 21.98% vs 20.14% for KJUL. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

KSEP vs. KJUL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KSEP achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly higher than KJUL's 6.64% return.

KSEP

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 1.74%
• YTD: 9.07%
• 6M: 9.85%
• 1Y: 21.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KJUL

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 6.64%
• 6M: 7.81%
• 1Y: 20.14%
• 3Y*: 10.70%
• 5Y*: 4.96%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSEP vs. KJUL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
KSEP Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September	9.07%	8.54%	3.08%
KJUL Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July	6.64%	7.70%	3.51%

Correlation

The correlation between KSEP and KJUL is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2024	0.96

The correlation between KSEP and KJUL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

KSEP vs. KJUL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSEP

KSEP Risk / Return Rank: 73
KSEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
KSEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
KSEP Omega Ratio Rank: 64
KSEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
KSEP Martin Ratio Rank: 82

KJUL

KJUL Risk / Return Rank: 84
KJUL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
KJUL Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
KJUL Omega Ratio Rank: 80
KJUL Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
KJUL Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSEP vs. KJUL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) and Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KSEP	KJUL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.51	-0.33
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	3.75	-0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.49	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.62	5.84	-1.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.76	21.64	-4.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

KSEP vs. KJUL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KSEP Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the KJUL Sharpe Ratio of 2.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KSEP and KJUL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KSEP	KJUL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.17	2.51	-0.33
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.41	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	0.57	+0.48

Drawdowns

KSEP vs. KJUL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KSEP drawdown since its inception was -14.92%, smaller than the maximum KJUL drawdown of -16.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KSEP and KJUL.

Drawdown Indicators

	KSEP	KJUL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.92%	-16.69%	+1.77%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.75%	-3.42%	-1.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-14.45%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.46%	-4.01%	+1.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.31%	0.92%	+0.39%

Volatility

KSEP vs. KJUL - Volatility Comparison

Innovator U.S. Small Cap Power Buffer ETF - September (KSEP) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to Innovator Russell 2000 Power Buffer ETF - July (KJUL) at 0.63%. This indicates that KSEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KJUL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KSEP	KJUL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.64%	0.63%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.29%	4.79%	+1.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.15%	8.06%	+2.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.66%	12.31%	-0.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.66%	11.68%	-0.02%

KSEP vs. KJUL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both KSEP and KJUL have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

KSEP vs. KJUL - Dividend Comparison

Neither KSEP nor KJUL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KSEP and KJUL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, KSEP and KJUL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, KSEP or KJUL?

KSEP has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to KJUL (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KSEP dropped -14.92% vs KJUL's -16.69%.

Which ETF is better, KSEP or KJUL?

On 1-year performance, KSEP leads with 21.98% vs 20.14% for KJUL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, KJUL has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KSEP or KJUL?

Over the 1-year period, KSEP has performed better with a 21.98% return vs 20.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KSEP or KJUL?

KSEP and KJUL have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KSEP or KJUL?

KSEP and KJUL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KJUL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.