PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDEC vs. FAAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDEC vs. FAAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDEC achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly lower than FAAR's 19.14% return.


PDEC

1D
-0.61%
1M
-0.15%
YTD
4.91%
6M
4.48%
1Y
15.68%
3Y*
11.56%
5Y*
8.33%
10Y*

FAAR

1D
-0.91%
1M
-5.21%
YTD
19.14%
6M
18.06%
1Y
28.33%
3Y*
10.57%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
4.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDEC vs. FAAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December
4.91%12.91%9.46%17.43%-5.95%9.59%8.45%0.91%
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
19.14%8.07%5.97%-5.63%10.15%12.34%8.60%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between PDEC and FAAR is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2019

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDEC vs. FAAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDEC
PDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
PDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FAAR
FAAR Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FAAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAAR Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FAAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAAR Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDEC vs. FAAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) and First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDECFAARDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

4.52

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.77

15.18

+1.59

PDEC vs. FAAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDEC Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the FAAR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDEC and FAAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDEC vs. FAAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDEC drawdown since its inception was -19.31%, which is greater than FAAR's maximum drawdown of -18.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDEC and FAAR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDECFAARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.31%

-18.03%

-1.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.78%

-6.29%

+1.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.77%

-11.54%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.53%

-18.03%

+6.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-6.29%

+5.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-7.82%

+5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

1.87%

-0.93%

Volatility

PDEC vs. FAAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December (PDEC) is 2.05%, while First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF (FAAR) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that PDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDECFAARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

2.55%

-0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.21%

9.68%

-4.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.87%

13.38%

-6.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.94%

12.96%

-4.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.95%

11.54%

-0.59%

PDEC vs. FAAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than FAAR's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDEC vs. FAAR - Dividend Comparison

PDEC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAAR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAAR
First Trust Alternative Absolute Return Strategy ETF
9.66%11.63%3.45%3.20%5.82%6.49%3.05%1.02%0.58%2.83%
PDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - December
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDEC and FAAR have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAAR has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to PDEC (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDEC dropped -19.31% vs FAAR's -18.03%.

On 5-year performance, PDEC leads with 8.33% vs 7.72% for FAAR. On fees, PDEC is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PDEC has been the lower-risk option at 2.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PDEC has performed better with a 8.33% return vs 7.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PDEC is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FAAR.

FAAR has the higher dividend yield at 9.66%, compared with 0.00% for PDEC.

PDEC is categorized as Defined Outcome, while FAAR is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for PDEC and 0.95% for FAAR.

PDEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDEC and FAAR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer