PDDL vs. AMDL
PDDL (GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF) and AMDL (GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDDL charges 1.50%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for AMDL.
Performance
PDDL vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDDL achieves a -49.84% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 260.90% return.
PDDL
- 1D
- -2.29%
- 1M
- -33.70%
- YTD
- -49.84%
- 6M
- -54.02%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AMDL
- 1D
- -21.59%
- 1M
- 15.94%
- YTD
- 260.90%
- 6M
- 243.03%
- 1Y
- 867.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDDL vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PDDL GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF | -49.84% | 7.42% |
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 260.90% | 53.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDDL and AMDL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025 | 0.23 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDDL vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank
PDDL
AMDL
PDDL vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (PDDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDDL | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 6.66 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | 0.37 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
PDDL vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDDL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDDL and AMDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDDL | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.62% | -88.63% | +20.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -56.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -67.18% | -27.12% | -40.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.89% | -48.47% | +18.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 28.58% | — |
Volatility
PDDL vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDDL | AMDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 45.25% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 97.71% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.58% | 131.65% | -65.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.58% | 117.43% | -50.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.58% | 117.43% | -50.85% |
PDDL vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDDL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDDL vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison
PDDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
AMDL GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDDL GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF | 0.67% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDDL and AMDL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMDL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMDL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for PDDL.
PDDL has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.
Their fees differ too: 1.50% for PDDL and 1.15% for AMDL.
Find the right allocation for PDDL and AMDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer