PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDDL vs. AMDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDDL vs. AMDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (PDDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDDL achieves a -49.84% return, which is significantly lower than AMDL's 260.90% return.


PDDL

1D
-2.29%
1M
-33.70%
YTD
-49.84%
6M
-54.02%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AMDL

1D
-21.59%
1M
15.94%
YTD
260.90%
6M
243.03%
1Y
867.59%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDDL vs. AMDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PDDL
GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF
-49.84%7.42%
AMDL
GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF
260.90%53.66%

Correlation

The correlation between PDDL and AMDL is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDDL vs. AMDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDDL

AMDL
AMDL Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
AMDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMDL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AMDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMDL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDDL vs. AMDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long PDD Daily ETF (PDDL) and GraniteShares 2x Long AMD Daily ETF (AMDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PDDL vs. AMDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PDDLAMDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.75

0.37

-1.12

Drawdowns

PDDL vs. AMDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDDL drawdown since its inception was -68.62%, smaller than the maximum AMDL drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDDL and AMDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDDLAMDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.62%

-88.63%

+20.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-56.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-67.18%

-27.12%

-40.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.89%

-48.47%

+18.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.58%

Volatility

PDDL vs. AMDL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDDLAMDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

45.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

97.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.58%

131.65%

-65.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.58%

117.43%

-50.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.58%

117.43%

-50.85%

PDDL vs. AMDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDDL has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than AMDL's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDDL vs. AMDL - Dividend Comparison

PDDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, while AMDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


PDDL and AMDL have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AMDL is cheaper at 1.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AMDL is cheaper with a 1.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for PDDL.

PDDL has the higher dividend yield at 0.67%, compared with 0.00% for AMDL.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for PDDL and 1.15% for AMDL.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDDL and AMDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer