PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDDDX vs. LTSTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDDDX vs. LTSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDDDX achieves a 5.19% return, which is significantly higher than LTSTX's 4.65% return.


PDDDX

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.00%
6M
3.60%
YTD
5.19%
1Y
10.18%
3Y*
11.57%
5Y*
10.24%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.11%

LTSTX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.78%
YTD
4.65%
1Y
10.25%
3Y*
10.98%
5Y*
5.19%
10Y*
7.81%
ALL TIME*
6.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PDDDX vs. LTSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDDDX
Prudential Day One 2020 Fund
5.19%10.40%15.97%9.52%-12.63%36.80%8.13%14.99%-4.65%10.17%
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
4.65%12.16%11.91%13.30%-15.23%10.91%13.70%20.50%-6.41%16.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PDDDX and LTSTX is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.92

The correlation between PDDDX and LTSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDDDX vs. LTSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PDDDX
PDDDX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PDDDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDDDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDDDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
PDDDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDDDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

LTSTX
LTSTX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
LTSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LTSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
LTSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
LTSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
LTSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PDDDX vs. LTSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX) and Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDDDXLTSTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

1.91

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.66

8.26

+3.40

PDDDX vs. LTSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDDDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is higher than the LTSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDDDX and LTSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDDDX vs. LTSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDDDX drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, smaller than the maximum LTSTX drawdown of -48.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDDDX and LTSTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDDDXLTSTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.88%

-48.17%

+29.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.90%

-5.24%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.05%

-8.12%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.64%

-21.01%

+4.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-0.61%

+0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.97%

-6.11%

+3.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.87%

1.21%

-0.34%

Volatility

PDDDX vs. LTSTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Prudential Day One 2020 Fund (PDDDX) is 1.35%, while Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund (LTSTX) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that PDDDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LTSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDDDXLTSTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.35%

1.91%

-0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.30%

5.99%

-1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.26%

7.18%

-1.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.76%

9.23%

+4.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.30%

9.76%

+1.54%

PDDDX vs. LTSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDDDX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than LTSTX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDDDX vs. LTSTX - Dividend Comparison

PDDDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, less than LTSTX's 11.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LTSTX
Principal LifeTime 2025 Fund
11.65%12.19%9.74%4.26%8.00%7.66%5.25%6.91%6.39%4.75%3.65%8.91%
PDDDX
Prudential Day One 2020 Fund
3.85%4.05%19.73%3.22%8.41%28.05%1.91%3.76%3.05%0.86%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, PDDDX and LTSTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

LTSTX has higher volatility (1.91%) compared to PDDDX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDDDX dropped -18.88% vs LTSTX's -48.17%.

PDDDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDDDX and LTSTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer