PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PDC.TO vs. XMMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PDC.TO vs. XMMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PDC.TO is traded in CAD, while XMMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XMMO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PDC.TO achieves a 22.51% return, which is significantly lower than XMMO's 27.06% return. Over the past 10 years, PDC.TO has underperformed XMMO with an annualized return of 11.53%, while XMMO has yielded a comparatively higher 21.32% annualized return.


PDC.TO

1D
0.30%
1M
2.66%
YTD
22.51%
6M
18.90%
1Y
39.38%
3Y*
23.19%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
11.53%

XMMO

1D
-2.53%
1M
5.93%
YTD
27.06%
6M
23.84%
1Y
39.89%
3Y*
34.32%
5Y*
19.22%
10Y*
21.32%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PDC.TO vs. XMMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
22.51%21.80%16.38%6.97%-4.17%30.14%-5.48%25.00%-11.85%10.27%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
27.06%7.88%49.72%17.53%-10.69%16.63%26.10%31.14%15.04%27.90%

Correlation

The correlation between PDC.TO and XMMO is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 20, 2011

0.42

The correlation between PDC.TO and XMMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.55 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PDC.TO vs. XMMO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PDC.TO
XMMO

Financial Services

44.8%
2.5%

Energy

21.2%
6.5%

Utilities

13.9%
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
2.2%

Communication Services

5.0%
1.3%

Basic Materials

3.5%
6.9%

Real Estate

2.4%
5.4%

Industrials

1.1%
41.5%

Consumer Defensive

0.9%
2.7%

Technology

0.7%
19.2%

Healthcare

-

6.3%

Financial Services

PDC.TO
44.8%
XMMO
2.5%

Energy

PDC.TO
21.2%
XMMO
6.5%

Utilities

PDC.TO
13.9%
XMMO
5.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PDC.TO
6.6%
XMMO
2.2%

Communication Services

PDC.TO
5.0%
XMMO
1.3%

Basic Materials

PDC.TO
3.5%
XMMO
6.9%

Real Estate

PDC.TO
2.4%
XMMO
5.4%

Industrials

PDC.TO
1.1%
XMMO
41.5%

Consumer Defensive

PDC.TO
0.9%
XMMO
2.7%

Technology

PDC.TO
0.7%
XMMO
19.2%

Healthcare

PDC.TO

-

XMMO
6.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PDC.TO vs. XMMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PDC.TO
PDC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

XMMO
XMMO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
XMMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XMMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
XMMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XMMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
XMMO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PDC.TO vs. XMMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PDC.TOXMMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.97

1.33

+0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.24

5.90

+4.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.94

19.19

+18.74

PDC.TO vs. XMMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PDC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 4.74, which is higher than the XMMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PDC.TO and XMMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PDC.TO vs. XMMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.93%, roughly equal to the maximum XMMO drawdown of -42.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDC.TO and XMMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PDC.TOXMMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.93%

-42.67%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.86%

-6.79%

+2.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.85%

-24.06%

+13.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.98%

-24.97%

+6.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.93%

-30.98%

-10.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.53%

+2.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.50%

-8.70%

+4.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

2.08%

-1.04%

Volatility

PDC.TO vs. XMMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) is 2.30%, while Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF (XMMO) has a volatility of 8.85%. This indicates that PDC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XMMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PDC.TOXMMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

8.85%

-6.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.27%

17.18%

-9.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.35%

20.41%

-12.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.84%

22.42%

-11.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.28%

23.23%

-7.95%

PDC.TO vs. XMMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PDC.TO has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XMMO's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

PDC.TO vs. XMMO - Dividend Comparison

PDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, more than XMMO's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDC.TO
Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF
3.22%3.96%4.48%4.77%4.24%3.65%5.07%4.33%5.12%4.23%3.77%4.39%
XMMO
Invesco S&P MidCap Momentum ETF
0.57%0.78%0.34%0.80%1.43%0.41%0.61%0.60%0.19%0.21%0.22%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


PDC.TO and XMMO have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XMMO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XMMO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.

PDC.TO is categorized as Dividend, while XMMO is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PDC.TO and 0.35% for XMMO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PDC.TO and XMMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer