PDC.TO vs. SPHQ
PDC.TO (Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF) and SPHQ (Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDC.TO is a Dividend fund managed by Invesco, while SPHQ is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality Index. Over the past 10 years, PDC.TO returned 10.86%/yr vs 15.84%/yr for SPHQ. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PDC.TO charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SPHQ.
Performance
PDC.TO vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PDC.TO is traded in CAD, while SPHQ is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPHQ values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDC.TO achieves a 19.02% return, which is significantly higher than SPHQ's 16.95% return. Over the past 10 years, PDC.TO has underperformed SPHQ with an annualized return of 10.86%, while SPHQ has yielded a comparatively higher 15.84% annualized return.
PDC.TO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 4.67%
- YTD
- 19.02%
- 6M
- 17.30%
- 1Y
- 35.38%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 13.12%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 9.31%
- YTD
- 16.95%
- 6M
- 15.61%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 23.83%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 15.84%
PDC.TO vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 19.02% | 21.62% | 16.14% | 6.74% | -4.34% | 29.91% | -5.70% | 24.75% | -12.03% | 10.06% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 16.95% | 8.06% | 36.22% | 22.08% | -9.76% | 26.87% | 15.38% | 27.07% | 0.78% | 11.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDC.TO and SPHQ is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2011 | 0.40 |
PDC.TO vs. SPHQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Financial Services
Energy
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Energy
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Utilities
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Consumer Cyclical
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Communication Services
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Basic Materials
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Real Estate
PDC.TO
SPHQ
-
Industrials
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Consumer Defensive
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Technology
PDC.TO
SPHQ
Healthcare
PDC.TO
-
SPHQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDC.TO vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
PDC.TO
SPHQ
PDC.TO vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDC.TO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.30 | 1.99 | +2.31 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.59 | 2.94 | +2.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.89 | 1.35 | +0.54 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.20 | 3.56 | +5.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 34.01 | 13.76 | +20.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDC.TO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.30 | 1.99 | +2.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.22 | 1.23 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 | 0.98 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.75 | 1.16 | -0.40 |
Drawdowns
PDC.TO vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDC.TO drawdown since its inception was -41.94%, which is greater than SPHQ's maximum drawdown of -25.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDC.TO and SPHQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDC.TO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.94% | -25.18% | -16.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.86% | -6.99% | +3.13% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.91% | -16.87% | +5.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.24% | -21.66% | +3.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.94% | -25.18% | -16.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | 0.00% | -0.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.56% | -2.86% | -1.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 1.81% | -0.77% |
Volatility
PDC.TO vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF (PDC.TO) is 2.97%, while Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that PDC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDC.TO | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.97% | 3.59% | -0.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 10.08% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.27% | 12.54% | -4.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.84% | 14.54% | -3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.29% | 16.26% | -0.97% |
PDC.TO vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDC.TO has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDC.TO vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
PDC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than SPHQ's 1.04% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDC.TO Invesco Canadian Dividend Index ETF | 3.26% | 3.84% | 4.29% | 4.56% | 4.05% | 3.49% | 4.85% | 4.14% | 4.90% | 4.05% | 3.61% | 4.20% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.04% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDC.TO and SPHQ have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPHQ is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPHQ is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDC.TO.
PDC.TO is categorized as Dividend, while SPHQ is S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PDC.TO and 0.15% for SPHQ.
Find the right allocation for PDC.TO and SPHQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer