PDBC vs. XLE
PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index. PDBC is actively managed, while XLE is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PDBC returned 9.21%/yr vs 10.52%/yr for XLE. Their 0.61 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PDBC charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLE.
Performance
PDBC vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBC achieves a 32.53% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 35.03% return. Over the past 10 years, PDBC has underperformed XLE with an annualized return of 9.21%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.52% annualized return.
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 11.28%
- 6M
- 20.94%
- YTD
- 32.53%
- 1Y
- 36.43%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 11.22%
- 10Y*
- 9.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.89%
XLE
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- 12.76%
- 6M
- 18.26%
- YTD
- 35.03%
- 1Y
- 40.82%
- 3Y*
- 14.62%
- 5Y*
- 23.67%
- 10Y*
- 10.52%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.87%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $92.97M | $139.65M | $120.69M | |
| $1.70B | $1.73B | $1.97B |
PDBC vs. XLE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 32.53% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -6.25% | 19.23% | 41.72% | -7.84% | 11.44% | -12.78% | 5.06% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 35.03% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBC and XLE is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2014 | 0.61 |
The correlation between PDBC and XLE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDBC vs. XLE — Risk / Return Rank
PDBC
XLE
PDBC vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDBC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.32 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.21 | 2.74 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.40 | 7.32 | +0.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDBC vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBC drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBC and XLE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.52% | -71.26% | +21.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.55% | -14.98% | -1.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -20.14% | +3.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | -26.04% | -1.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.73% | -66.81% | +26.08% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.14% | -4.13% | -3.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.03% | -17.93% | -5.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.98% | 5.62% | -0.64% |
Volatility
PDBC vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a higher volatility of 7.00% compared to State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) at 5.85%. This indicates that PDBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDBC | XLE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.00% | 5.85% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.41% | 16.71% | +0.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.62% | 21.05% | -1.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.27% | 25.77% | -6.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 29.57% | -11.74% |
PDBC vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBC has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDBC vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, more than XLE's 2.55% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 2.90% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% | 0.00% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.55% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDBC and XLE have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to XLE (5.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBC dropped -49.52% vs XLE's -71.26%.
On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 10.52% vs 9.21% for PDBC. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 5.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 10.52% return vs 9.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
PDBC has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 2.55% for XLE.
PDBC is categorized as Commodities, while XLE is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PDBC and 0.08% for XLE.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.95 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDBC and XLE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer