PDBC vs. BEMB
PDBC (Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF) and BEMB (Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PDBC is a Commodities fund actively managed by Invesco, while BEMB is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund actively managed by iShares. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, PDBC returned 9.41%/yr vs 8.09%/yr for BEMB. Their -0.07 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. PDBC charges 0.58%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BEMB.
Performance
PDBC vs. BEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBC achieves a 28.15% return, which is significantly higher than BEMB's 1.47% return.
PDBC
- 1D
- 0.47%
- 1M
- 5.47%
- 6M
- 18.25%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 1Y
- 35.58%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 8.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 3.59%
BEMB
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.37%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 1Y
- 6.32%
- 3Y*
- 8.09%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $18.24K | $41.97K | $49.14K | |
| $121.86M | $152.61M | $122.20M |
PDBC vs. BEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 28.15% | 5.96% | 2.09% | -2.49% |
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 1.47% | 12.27% | 5.51% | 8.88% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBC and BEMB is -0.37, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2023 | -0.07 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between PDBC and BEMB has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.07 to -0.37, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDBC vs. BEMB — Risk / Return Rank
PDBC
BEMB
PDBC vs. BEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) and Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PDBC | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.27 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.73 | +0.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 7.06 | +0.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PDBC vs. BEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBC drawdown since its inception was -49.52%, which is greater than BEMB's maximum drawdown of -6.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBC and BEMB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBC | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.52% | -6.17% | -43.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.55% | -3.67% | -12.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.55% | -5.52% | -11.03% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.63% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.21% | -0.53% | -9.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -23.02% | -0.92% | -22.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.05% | 0.90% | +4.15% |
Volatility
PDBC vs. BEMB - Volatility Comparison
Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF (PDBC) has a higher volatility of 7.58% compared to Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) at 1.31%. This indicates that PDBC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDBC | BEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.58% | 1.31% | +6.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.65% | 3.70% | +12.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 4.38% | +15.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 5.81% | +13.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.85% | 5.81% | +12.04% |
PDBC vs. BEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBC has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than BEMB's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDBC vs. BEMB - Dividend Comparison
PDBC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, less than BEMB's 6.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BEMB Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF | 6.88% | 6.88% | 6.31% | 5.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PDBC Invesco Optimum Yield Diversified Commodity Strategy No K-1 ETF | 3.00% | 3.84% | 4.42% | 4.21% | 13.05% | 50.83% | 0.01% | 1.40% | 1.00% | 3.83% | 6.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDBC and BEMB have a correlation of -0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBC has higher volatility (7.58%) compared to BEMB (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBC dropped -49.52% vs BEMB's -6.17%.
On 3-year performance, PDBC leads with 9.41% vs 8.09% for BEMB. On fees, BEMB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BEMB has been the lower-risk option at 1.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, PDBC has performed better with a 9.41% return vs 8.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEMB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for PDBC.
BEMB has the higher dividend yield at 6.88%, compared with 3.00% for PDBC.
PDBC is categorized as Commodities, while BEMB is Emerging Markets Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for PDBC and 0.18% for BEMB.
PDBC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDBC and BEMB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer