PDBAX vs. FIKQX
Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX).
PDBAX is managed by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 10, 1995. FIKQX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018.
Performance
PDBAX vs. FIKQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PDBAX vs. FIKQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | -0.40% | 7.50% | 1.82% | 6.51% | -14.52% | -1.77% | 7.78% | 14.71% | 2.07% |
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | -0.21% | 7.31% | 1.69% | 6.75% | -13.97% | -1.03% | 10.00% | 9.90% | 2.01% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBAX achieves a -0.40% return, which is significantly lower than FIKQX's -0.21% return.
PDBAX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.79%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- 0.39%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
FIKQX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.21%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- 1Y
- 3.86%
- 3Y*
- 3.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.41%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PDBAX vs. FIKQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FIKQX's 0.36% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PDBAX vs. FIKQX — Risk / Return Rank
PDBAX
FIKQX
PDBAX vs. FIKQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBAX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 0.95 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.34 | 1.37 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.17 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.64 | -0.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.43 | 4.72 | -0.29 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBAX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 0.95 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.49 | +0.60 |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBAX and FIKQX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PDBAX vs. FIKQX - Dividend Comparison
PDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than FIKQX's 3.66% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | 3.94% | 4.27% | 3.76% | 3.55% | 5.49% | 2.47% | 2.68% | 10.32% | 3.74% | 2.60% | 3.65% | 2.94% |
FIKQX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z | 3.66% | 3.97% | 4.08% | 3.65% | 2.05% | 1.44% | 4.90% | 2.83% | 1.07% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
PDBAX vs. FIKQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBAX drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, which is greater than FIKQX's maximum drawdown of -18.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBAX and FIKQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBAX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -18.53% | -2.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -2.83% | -0.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | -18.53% | -2.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.51% | -2.16% | -0.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.48% | -5.30% | +2.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.07% | 0.98% | +0.09% |
Volatility
PDBAX vs. FIKQX - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class Z (FIKQX) at 1.48%. This indicates that PDBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FIKQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PDBAX | FIKQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.48% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 2.58% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.59% | 4.39% | +0.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.99% | 5.98% | +0.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.32% | 5.51% | -0.19% |