PDBAX vs. PTRB
PDBAX (PGIM Total Return Bond Fund) and PTRB (PGIM Total Return Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds from PGIM. Over the past 3 years, PDBAX returned 4.51%/yr vs 5.18%/yr for PTRB. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PDBAX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for PTRB.
Performance
PDBAX vs. PTRB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PDBAX achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly lower than PTRB's 0.53% return.
PDBAX
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 5.87%
- 3Y*
- 4.51%
- 5Y*
- 0.28%
- 10Y*
- 2.46%
PTRB
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.60%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PDBAX vs. PTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | 0.45% | 7.50% | 1.82% | 6.51% | -14.52% | 0.16% |
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF | 0.53% | 7.63% | 2.67% | 7.71% | -14.82% | -0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PDBAX and PTRB is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2021 | 0.91 |
The correlation between PDBAX and PTRB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PDBAX vs. PTRB — Risk / Return Rank
PDBAX
PTRB
PDBAX vs. PTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PDBAX | PTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.28 | 1.48 | -0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.93 | 2.16 | -0.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.26 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.01 | 1.95 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.95 | 5.87 | +0.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PDBAX | PTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.28 | 1.48 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.46 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.09 | 0.06 | +1.03 |
Drawdowns
PDBAX vs. PTRB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PDBAX drawdown since its inception was -21.24%, which is greater than PTRB's maximum drawdown of -19.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PDBAX and PTRB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PDBAX | PTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.24% | -19.17% | -2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.07% | -2.90% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.99% | -5.52% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.01% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.24% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -1.42% | -0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.47% | -7.65% | +5.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.96% | +0.08% |
Volatility
PDBAX vs. PTRB - Volatility Comparison
PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) has a higher volatility of 2.09% compared to PGIM Total Return Bond ETF (PTRB) at 1.43%. This indicates that PDBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PDBAX | PTRB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.09% | 1.43% | +0.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.32% | 2.86% | +0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.41% | 4.01% | +0.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.04% | 6.25% | -0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.36% | 6.25% | -0.89% |
PDBAX vs. PTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PDBAX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than PTRB's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
PDBAX vs. PTRB - Dividend Comparison
PDBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, less than PTRB's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund | 4.31% | 4.27% | 3.76% | 3.55% | 5.49% | 2.47% | 2.68% | 10.32% | 3.74% | 2.60% | 3.65% | 2.94% |
PTRB PGIM Total Return Bond ETF | 4.73% | 4.73% | 5.10% | 4.62% | 4.07% | 0.12% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PDBAX and PTRB have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PDBAX has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to PTRB (1.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PDBAX dropped -21.24% vs PTRB's -19.17%.
PTRB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PDBAX and PTRB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer