PCT vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PCT (PureCycle Technologies, Inc.) is a stock, while IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Over the past year, PCT returned 38.12% vs -35.90% for IBIT. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

PCT vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCT achieves a 49.53% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -23.36% return.

PCT

• 1D: 5.03%
• 1M: 63.42%
• YTD: 49.53%
• 6M: 54.20%
• 1Y: 38.12%
• 3Y*: 19.33%
• 5Y*: -7.47%
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: -6.03%
• 1M: -14.44%
• YTD: -23.36%
• 6M: -26.36%
• 1Y: -35.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCT vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PCT PureCycle Technologies, Inc.	49.53%	-16.20%	318.37%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-23.36%	-6.41%	99.21%

Correlation

The correlation between PCT and IBIT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2024	0.31

Return for Risk

PCT vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCT

PCT Risk / Return Rank: 55
PCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
PCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PCT Omega Ratio Rank: 56
PCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PCT Martin Ratio Rank: 50

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 2
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCT vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCT	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.48	-0.83	+1.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.28	-1.09	+2.36
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	0.88	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.50	-0.73	+1.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.88	-1.27	+2.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCT vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCT Sharpe Ratio is 0.48, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCT and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCT	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48	-0.83	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.04	0.32	-0.28

Drawdowns

PCT vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCT drawdown since its inception was -92.66%, which is greater than IBIT's maximum drawdown of -49.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCT and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCT	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-92.66%	-49.36%	-43.30%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-70.09%	-49.36%	-20.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.73%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-90.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-60.71%	-46.63%	-14.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-63.20%	-15.96%	-47.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	39.90%	28.28%	+11.62%

Volatility

PCT vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

PureCycle Technologies, Inc. (PCT) has a higher volatility of 29.55% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 9.76%. This indicates that PCT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCT	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.55%	9.76%	+19.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.24%	34.85%	+28.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	80.37%	43.65%	+36.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	92.37%	50.20%	+42.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	91.10%	50.20%	+40.90%

Dividends

PCT vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

Neither PCT nor IBIT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCT and IBIT in my portfolio?

PCT and IBIT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCT or IBIT?

PCT has higher volatility (29.55%) compared to IBIT (9.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCT dropped -92.66% vs IBIT's -49.36%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.48 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.