PCSGX vs. HSPGX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PCSGX (PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments) and HSPGX (Emerald Growth Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCSGX returned 11.09%/yr vs 16.12%/yr for HSPGX. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 1.03% expense ratio.

Performance

PCSGX vs. HSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCSGX achieves a 17.46% return, which is significantly lower than HSPGX's 30.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PCSGX has underperformed HSPGX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while HSPGX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.12% annualized return.

PCSGX

• 1D: -0.87%
• 1M: 3.72%
• 6M: 13.32%
• YTD: 17.46%
• 1Y: 23.40%
• 3Y*: 11.33%
• 5Y*: 2.68%
• 10Y*: 11.09%

HSPGX

• 1D: -1.01%
• 1M: 1.35%
• 6M: 22.25%
• YTD: 30.71%
• 1Y: 60.51%
• 3Y*: 32.14%
• 5Y*: 14.15%
• 10Y*: 16.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCSGX vs. HSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCSGX PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments	17.46%	2.00%	12.20%	15.89%	-26.58%	14.91%	38.85%	24.05%	0.33%	23.26%
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	30.71%	31.62%	28.04%	18.66%	-24.65%	3.59%	38.49%	28.33%	-12.16%	27.72%

Correlation

The correlation between PCSGX and HSPGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.82
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1995	0.91

The correlation between PCSGX and HSPGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.82 (1 year) to 0.93 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PCSGX vs. HSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCSGX

PCSGX Risk / Return Rank: 35
PCSGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
PCSGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
PCSGX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
PCSGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
PCSGX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

HSPGX

HSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 86
HSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
HSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
HSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 74
HSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
HSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCSGX vs. HSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) and Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCSGX	HSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.24	2.28	-1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.93	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.36	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	4.26	-2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.79	17.35	-10.56

PCSGX vs. HSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCSGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the HSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCSGX and HSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCSGX vs. HSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCSGX drawdown since its inception was -56.32%, smaller than the maximum HSPGX drawdown of -60.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCSGX and HSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCSGX	HSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.32%	-60.28%	+3.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.48%	-14.41%	+0.93%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.64%	-28.63%	+0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.48%	-38.65%	+1.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.35%	-41.48%	+2.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.46%	-5.31%	+2.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.37%	-18.96%	+6.59%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	3.52%	+0.12%

Volatility

PCSGX vs. HSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments (PCSGX) is 6.57%, while Emerald Growth Fund (HSPGX) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that PCSGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCSGX	HSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.57%	9.12%	-2.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.24%	20.74%	-5.50%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.53%	26.94%	-6.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.04%	25.81%	-2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.83%	25.21%	-2.38%

PCSGX vs. HSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PCSGX and HSPGX have an expense ratio of 1.03%.

Dividends

PCSGX vs. HSPGX - Dividend Comparison

PCSGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.45%, less than HSPGX's 9.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HSPGX Emerald Growth Fund	9.75%	12.74%	21.85%	6.43%	8.77%	19.11%	8.48%	1.45%	11.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PCSGX PACE Small/Medium Co Growth Equity Investments	5.45%	6.40%	3.06%	0.00%	0.00%	45.92%	6.50%	15.70%	20.15%	5.56%	0.00%	25.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCSGX and HSPGX in my portfolio?

PCSGX and HSPGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCSGX or HSPGX?

HSPGX has higher volatility (9.12%) compared to PCSGX (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCSGX dropped -56.32% vs HSPGX's -60.28%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HSPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.