PCRPX vs. PCN
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN).
PCRPX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Apr 30, 2008. PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001.
Performance
PCRPX vs. PCN - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PCRPX vs. PCN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRPX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 21.14% | 16.26% | 10.79% | -6.20% | 9.12% | 33.01% | 0.73% | 12.24% | -13.90% | 2.62% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | -4.21% | 5.55% | 19.52% | 16.22% | -22.88% | 6.93% | -2.19% | 39.10% | -5.94% | 26.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRPX achieves a 21.14% return, which is significantly higher than PCN's -4.21% return. Over the past 10 years, PCRPX has outperformed PCN with an annualized return of 9.23%, while PCN has yielded a comparatively lower 8.27% annualized return.
PCRPX
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 9.42%
- YTD
- 21.14%
- 6M
- 25.05%
- 1Y
- 27.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.64%
- 5Y*
- 14.38%
- 10Y*
- 9.23%
PCN
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -4.53%
- YTD
- -4.21%
- 6M
- -6.22%
- 1Y
- -3.05%
- 3Y*
- 8.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PCRPX vs. PCN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRPX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than PCN's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PCRPX vs. PCN — Risk / Return Rank
PCRPX
PCN
PCRPX vs. PCN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) and PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCRPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.76 | -0.20 | +1.95 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.26 | -0.15 | +2.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 0.97 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.22 | -0.20 | +3.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.64 | -0.66 | +10.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCRPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.76 | -0.20 | +1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.14 | +0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.38 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.02 | 0.39 | -0.37 |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRPX and PCN is 0.18, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PCRPX vs. PCN - Dividend Comparison
PCRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.20%, less than PCN's 11.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRPX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund | 4.20% | 5.09% | 8.47% | 6.50% | 46.40% | 22.80% | 1.51% | 3.93% | 5.85% | 8.06% | 0.83% | 5.23% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | 11.34% | 10.58% | 10.06% | 10.88% | 12.66% | 7.89% | 7.83% | 7.37% | 9.60% | 7.85% | 11.98% | 10.22% |
Drawdowns
PCRPX vs. PCN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRPX drawdown since its inception was -72.22%, which is greater than PCN's maximum drawdown of -61.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRPX and PCN.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -72.22% | -61.12% | -11.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.44% | -13.78% | +4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.54% | -33.39% | -1.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.15% | -50.27% | +11.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.48% | -6.71% | -1.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -39.76% | -7.22% | -32.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.15% | 4.32% | -1.17% |
Volatility
PCRPX vs. PCN - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund (PCRPX) has a higher volatility of 7.30% compared to PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) at 5.81%. This indicates that PCRPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PCRPX | PCN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.30% | 5.81% | +1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.33% | 8.64% | +4.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.69% | 15.69% | +1.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.62% | 16.55% | +3.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.12% | 21.97% | -4.85% |