PCRB vs. CRUX
PCRB (Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF -) and CRUX (Columbia Core Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCRB charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for CRUX.
Performance
PCRB vs. CRUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PCRB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.05%
- YTD
- -0.48%
- 6M
- -0.39%
- 1Y
- 3.33%
- 3Y*
- 4.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CRUX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCRB vs. CRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | -1.05% |
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 0.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRB and CRUX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2026 | 0.85 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCRB vs. CRUX — Risk / Return Rank
PCRB
CRUX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PCRB vs. CRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - (PCRB) and Columbia Core Bond ETF (CRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCRB | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.44 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.47 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCRB vs. CRUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRB drawdown since its inception was -7.20%, which is greater than CRUX's maximum drawdown of -1.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRB and CRUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRB | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -1.85% | -5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.85% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.34% | -0.50% | -1.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.65% | -0.60% | -1.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | — | — |
Volatility
PCRB vs. CRUX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCRB | CRUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.69% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.72% | 4.10% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 4.10% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.62% | 4.10% | +1.52% |
PCRB vs. CRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRB has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than CRUX's 0.32% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCRB vs. CRUX - Dividend Comparison
PCRB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.42%, more than CRUX's 1.06% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CRUX Columbia Core Bond ETF | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCRB Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF - | 9.42% | 4.30% | 4.38% | 3.65% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCRB and CRUX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CRUX is cheaper at 0.32% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CRUX is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PCRB.
PCRB has the higher dividend yield at 9.42%, compared with 1.06% for CRUX.
They also come from different issuers: Putnam and Columbia Threadneedle. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for PCRB and 0.32% for CRUX.
Find the right allocation for PCRB and CRUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer