PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCN vs. PCRAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCN vs. PCRAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A (PCRAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCN achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly lower than PCRAX's 26.62% return. Over the past 10 years, PCN has underperformed PCRAX with an annualized return of 7.14%, while PCRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.15% annualized return.


PCN

1D
-0.93%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
1.37%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
7.14%

PCRAX

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.55%
YTD
26.62%
6M
23.44%
1Y
39.10%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
12.24%
10Y*
8.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCN vs. PCRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
-4.37%5.55%19.52%16.22%-22.88%6.93%-2.19%39.10%-5.94%26.20%
PCRAX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A
26.62%16.56%10.08%-6.38%8.54%32.65%0.39%11.77%-14.24%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between PCN and PCRAX is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2002

0.15

The correlation between PCN and PCRAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCN vs. PCRAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCN
PCN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

PCRAX
PCRAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
PCRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
PCRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCN vs. PCRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A (PCRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCNPCRAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.43

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

5.56

-5.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

17.26

-16.88

PCN vs. PCRAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCN Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the PCRAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCN and PCRAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCNPCRAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

2.44

-2.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

0.62

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

0.48

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.17

+0.22

Drawdowns

PCN vs. PCRAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCN drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, smaller than the maximum PCRAX drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCN and PCRAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCNPCRAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.12%

-82.98%

+21.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

-7.14%

-3.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.53%

-10.47%

-12.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.39%

-34.95%

+1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

-39.45%

-10.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

-43.23%

+36.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-48.87%

+41.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

2.29%

+1.27%

Volatility

PCN vs. PCRAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) is 2.35%, while PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A (PCRAX) has a volatility of 5.25%. This indicates that PCN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCNPCRAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

5.25%

-2.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

14.19%

-7.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.61%

16.38%

-6.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

19.80%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

17.21%

+4.73%

PCN vs. PCRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCN has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than PCRAX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCN vs. PCRAX - Dividend Comparison

PCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.58%, more than PCRAX's 4.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
11.58%10.58%10.06%10.88%12.66%7.89%7.83%7.37%9.60%7.85%11.98%10.22%
PCRAX
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A
4.13%5.72%8.12%6.65%48.19%23.28%1.23%3.70%5.69%7.90%0.60%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCN and PCRAX have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCRAX has higher volatility (5.25%) compared to PCN (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCN dropped -61.12% vs PCRAX's -82.98%.

PCRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCN and PCRAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer