PCRAX vs. PCLPX
PCRAX (PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A) and PCLPX (PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2) are both Commodities funds from PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, PCRAX returned 7.19%/yr vs 10.81%/yr for PCLPX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCRAX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.92%/yr for PCLPX.
Performance
PCRAX vs. PCLPX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRAX achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly lower than PCLPX's 25.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PCRAX has underperformed PCLPX with an annualized return of 7.19%, while PCLPX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.81% annualized return.
PCRAX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 23.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
PCLPX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -9.67%
- YTD
- 25.15%
- 6M
- 22.59%
- 1Y
- 27.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.00%
- 5Y*
- 13.50%
- 10Y*
- 10.81%
PCRAX vs. PCLPX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRAX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A | 15.72% | 16.56% | 10.08% | -6.38% | 8.54% | 32.65% | 0.39% | 11.77% | -14.24% | 2.35% |
PCLPX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 | 25.15% | 4.45% | 5.92% | 0.24% | 23.04% | 43.50% | -9.12% | 19.39% | -12.15% | 10.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRAX and PCLPX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2010 | 0.87 |
The correlation between PCRAX and PCLPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCRAX vs. PCLPX — Risk / Return Rank
PCRAX
PCLPX
PCRAX vs. PCLPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A (PCRAX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCRAX | PCLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.23 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 1.90 | -0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | 8.06 | -0.44 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCRAX vs. PCLPX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRAX drawdown since its inception was -82.98%, which is greater than PCLPX's maximum drawdown of -66.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRAX and PCLPX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRAX | PCLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.98% | -66.98% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -12.87% | +1.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.83% | -13.55% | +1.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | -21.53% | -13.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.45% | -51.87% | +12.42% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.12% | -12.87% | -35.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.86% | -24.60% | -24.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 3.42% | -0.41% |
Volatility
PCRAX vs. PCLPX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A (PCRAX) is 3.72%, while PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that PCRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PCLPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCRAX | PCLPX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 4.59% | -0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 17.15% | -2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.57% | 19.47% | -2.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 19.53% | +0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 40.63% | -23.42% |
PCRAX vs. PCLPX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRAX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than PCLPX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCRAX vs. PCLPX - Dividend Comparison
PCRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%, less than PCLPX's 11.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCLPX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 | 11.31% | 1.31% | 5.22% | 4.65% | 43.16% | 74.10% | 0.71% | 2.39% | 18.62% | 12.52% | 0.15% | 1.92% |
PCRAX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A | 11.05% | 5.72% | 8.12% | 6.65% | 48.19% | 23.28% | 1.23% | 3.70% | 5.69% | 7.90% | 0.60% | 5.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCRAX and PCLPX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCLPX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to PCRAX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCRAX dropped -82.98% vs PCLPX's -66.98%.
PCRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCRAX and PCLPX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer