PCRAX vs. DCMSX
PCRAX (PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A) and DCMSX (DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCRAX returned 7.19%/yr vs 6.78%/yr for DCMSX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. PCRAX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for DCMSX.
Performance
PCRAX vs. DCMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCRAX achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly lower than DCMSX's 20.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PCRAX has outperformed DCMSX with an annualized return of 7.19%, while DCMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.78% annualized return.
PCRAX
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -8.82%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 12.25%
- 1Y
- 23.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.08%
- 5Y*
- 10.55%
- 10Y*
- 7.19%
DCMSX
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- 20.58%
- 6M
- 19.04%
- 1Y
- 27.75%
- 3Y*
- 13.22%
- 5Y*
- 10.69%
- 10Y*
- 6.78%
PCRAX vs. DCMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCRAX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A | 15.72% | 16.56% | 10.08% | -6.38% | 8.54% | 32.65% | 0.39% | 11.77% | -14.24% | 2.35% |
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio | 20.58% | 15.15% | 5.90% | -9.14% | 11.36% | 33.54% | -1.78% | 7.96% | -11.22% | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCRAX and DCMSX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 9, 2010 | 0.96 |
The correlation between PCRAX and DCMSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCRAX vs. DCMSX — Risk / Return Rank
PCRAX
DCMSX
PCRAX vs. DCMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A (PCRAX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCRAX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.28 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 2.32 | -0.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | 9.27 | -1.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCRAX vs. DCMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCRAX drawdown since its inception was -82.98%, which is greater than DCMSX's maximum drawdown of -60.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCRAX and DCMSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCRAX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.98% | -60.94% | -22.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.83% | -11.27% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.83% | -11.27% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.95% | -27.93% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.45% | -32.52% | -6.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -48.12% | -11.27% | -36.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -48.86% | -31.70% | -17.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 3.26% | -0.25% |
Volatility
PCRAX vs. DCMSX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A (PCRAX) and DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio (DCMSX) have volatilities of 3.72% and 3.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCRAX | DCMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.72% | 3.82% | -0.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.31% | 14.29% | +0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.57% | 16.47% | +0.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.76% | 16.26% | +3.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.21% | 14.48% | +2.73% |
PCRAX vs. DCMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCRAX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than DCMSX's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCRAX vs. DCMSX - Dividend Comparison
PCRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.05%, more than DCMSX's 8.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DCMSX DFA Commodity Strategy Portfolio | 8.74% | 10.75% | 2.83% | 2.52% | 7.46% | 49.44% | 0.37% | 1.51% | 1.63% | 3.09% | 0.47% | 0.15% |
PCRAX PIMCO Commodity Real Return Strategy Fund Class A | 11.05% | 5.72% | 8.12% | 6.65% | 48.19% | 23.28% | 1.23% | 3.70% | 5.69% | 7.90% | 0.60% | 5.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, PCRAX and DCMSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
DCMSX has higher volatility (3.82%) compared to PCRAX (3.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCRAX dropped -82.98% vs DCMSX's -60.94%.
DCMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCRAX and DCMSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer