PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCN vs. ADAMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCN vs. ADAMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCN achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly lower than ADAMH's 1.96% return.


PCN

1D
-0.93%
1M
-2.08%
YTD
-4.37%
6M
-2.52%
1Y
1.37%
3Y*
7.28%
5Y*
0.63%
10Y*
7.14%

ADAMH

1D
0.28%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.96%
6M
5.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCN vs. ADAMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
-4.37%0.92%
ADAMH
Adamas Trust, Inc.
1.96%6.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PCN and ADAMH is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.07

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCN vs. ADAMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCN
PCN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ADAMH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCN vs. ADAMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PCNADAMHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.39

PCN vs. ADAMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PCNADAMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

2.37

-1.98

Drawdowns

PCN vs. ADAMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCN drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, which is greater than ADAMH's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCN and ADAMH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCNADAMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.12%

-1.81%

-59.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

-0.03%

-6.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.20%

-0.47%

-6.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.56%

Volatility

PCN vs. ADAMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCNADAMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.61%

4.85%

+4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.18%

4.85%

+11.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.94%

4.85%

+17.09%

Dividends

PCN vs. ADAMH - Dividend Comparison

PCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.58%, more than ADAMH's 7.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADAMH
Adamas Trust, Inc.
7.01%4.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PCN
PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund
11.58%10.58%10.06%10.88%12.66%7.89%7.83%7.37%9.60%7.85%11.98%10.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


PCN and ADAMH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCN and ADAMH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer