PCN vs. ADAMH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH).

PCN is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 20, 2001.

Performance

PCN vs. ADAMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PCN vs. ADAMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	-4.21%	0.92%
ADAMH Adamas Trust, Inc.	-1.57%	6.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCN achieves a -4.21% return, which is significantly lower than ADAMH's -1.57% return.

PCN

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -4.53%
• YTD: -4.21%
• 6M: -6.22%
• 1Y: -3.05%
• 3Y*: 8.96%
• 5Y*: 2.37%
• 10Y*: 8.27%

ADAMH

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: -1.19%
• YTD: -1.57%
• 6M: 3.25%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PCN vs. ADAMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCN

PCN Risk / Return Rank: 3
PCN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
PCN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
PCN Omega Ratio Rank: 3
PCN Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
PCN Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCN vs. ADAMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCN	ADAMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.20	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.15	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.66	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCN	ADAMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.20	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.38	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.39	1.75	-1.36

Correlation

The correlation between PCN and ADAMH is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PCN vs. ADAMH - Dividend Comparison

PCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, more than ADAMH's 7.26% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund	11.34%	10.58%	10.06%	10.88%	12.66%	7.89%	7.83%	7.37%	9.60%	7.85%	11.98%	10.22%
ADAMH Adamas Trust, Inc.	7.26%	4.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PCN vs. ADAMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCN drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, which is greater than ADAMH's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCN and ADAMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCN	ADAMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.12%	-1.81%	-59.31%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.78%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.39%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-50.27%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.71%	-1.57%	-5.14%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.22%	-0.53%	-6.69%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PCN	ADAMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.81%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.69%	4.77%	+10.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.55%	4.77%	+11.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.97%	4.77%	+17.20%