PCN vs. ADAMH
PCN (PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund) is Multisector Bonds fund managed by PIMCO, while ADAMH (Adamas Trust, Inc.) is a stock. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PCN vs. ADAMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCN achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly lower than ADAMH's 1.96% return.
PCN
- 1D
- -0.93%
- 1M
- -2.08%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -2.52%
- 1Y
- 1.37%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- 0.63%
- 10Y*
- 7.14%
ADAMH
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.96%
- 6M
- 5.11%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCN vs. ADAMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | -4.37% | 0.92% |
ADAMH Adamas Trust, Inc. | 1.96% | 6.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCN and ADAMH is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCN vs. ADAMH — Risk / Return Rank
PCN
ADAMH
PCN vs. ADAMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund (PCN) and Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PCN | ADAMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.39 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PCN | ADAMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.33 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 2.37 | -1.98 |
Drawdowns
PCN vs. ADAMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCN drawdown since its inception was -61.12%, which is greater than ADAMH's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCN and ADAMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCN | ADAMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.12% | -1.81% | -59.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.53% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.87% | -0.03% | -6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.20% | -0.47% | -6.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.56% | — | — |
Volatility
PCN vs. ADAMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCN | ADAMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.35% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.61% | 4.85% | +4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 4.85% | +11.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.94% | 4.85% | +17.09% |
Dividends
PCN vs. ADAMH - Dividend Comparison
PCN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.58%, more than ADAMH's 7.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ADAMH Adamas Trust, Inc. | 7.01% | 4.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PCN PIMCO Corporate & Income Strategy Fund | 11.58% | 10.58% | 10.06% | 10.88% | 12.66% | 7.89% | 7.83% | 7.37% | 9.60% | 7.85% | 11.98% | 10.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCN and ADAMH have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for PCN and ADAMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer