PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADAMH vs. AGNC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ADAMH vs. AGNC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADAMH achieves a 1.96% return, which is significantly higher than AGNC's 0.27% return.


ADAMH

1D
0.28%
1M
0.48%
YTD
1.96%
6M
5.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AGNC

1D
-0.29%
1M
-3.41%
YTD
0.27%
6M
3.92%
1Y
30.16%
3Y*
18.69%
5Y*
1.55%
10Y*
6.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ADAMH vs. AGNC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ADAMH
Adamas Trust, Inc.
1.96%6.34%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
0.27%12.91%

Correlation

The correlation between ADAMH and AGNC is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2025

0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADAMH:

$2.37B

AGNC:

$11.42B

EPS

ADAMH:

$1.70

AGNC:

$1.33

PE Ratio

ADAMH:

15.15

AGNC:

7.64

PS Ratio

ADAMH:

3.30

AGNC:

4.69

PB Ratio

ADAMH:

2.59

AGNC:

1.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADAMH:

$713.66M

AGNC:

$2.33B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADAMH:

$546.72M

AGNC:

$2.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADAMH:

$477.31M

AGNC:

$3.72B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADAMH vs. AGNC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADAMH

AGNC
AGNC Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
AGNC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AGNC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
AGNC Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
AGNC Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
AGNC Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADAMH vs. AGNC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH) and AGNC Investment Corp. (AGNC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ADAMH vs. AGNC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADAMHAGNCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.57

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.37

0.43

+1.94

Drawdowns

ADAMH vs. AGNC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADAMH drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum AGNC drawdown of -54.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADAMH and AGNC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ADAMHAGNCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-54.56%

+52.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-11.67%

+11.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.47%

-13.57%

+13.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.17%

Volatility

ADAMH vs. AGNC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ADAMHAGNCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.85%

19.35%

-14.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.85%

25.81%

-20.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.85%

25.38%

-20.53%

Dividends

ADAMH vs. AGNC - Dividend Comparison

ADAMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.01%, less than AGNC's 14.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADAMH
Adamas Trust, Inc.
7.01%4.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
AGNC
AGNC Investment Corp.
14.16%13.43%15.64%14.68%13.91%9.57%10.00%11.31%12.31%10.70%12.69%14.30%

Financials

ADAMH vs. AGNC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adamas Trust, Inc. and AGNC Investment Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-2.00B-1.00B0.001.00B2.00B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
229.24M
0
(ADAMH) Total Revenue
(AGNC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


ADAMH and AGNC have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ADAMH and AGNC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer