PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ADAMH vs. NLY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

ADAMH vs. NLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH) and Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

ADAMH vs. NLY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ADAMH
Adamas Trust, Inc.
-0.58%6.34%
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
-2.28%11.03%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ADAMH:

$2.31B

NLY:

$14.69B

EPS

ADAMH:

$1.63

NLY:

$3.14

PE Ratio

ADAMH:

15.38

NLY:

6.74

PS Ratio

ADAMH:

3.06

NLY:

3.26

PB Ratio

ADAMH:

2.60

NLY:

1.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

ADAMH:

$749.34M

NLY:

$4.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ADAMH:

$392.88M

NLY:

$4.15B

EBITDA (TTM)

ADAMH:

$306.09M

NLY:

$3.29B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ADAMH achieves a -0.58% return, which is significantly higher than NLY's -2.28% return.


ADAMH

1D
1.01%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
5.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NLY

1D
-0.09%
1M
-5.86%
YTD
-2.28%
6M
9.23%
1Y
20.39%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
5.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ADAMH vs. NLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ADAMH

NLY
NLY Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
NLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
NLY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
NLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
NLY Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ADAMH vs. NLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Adamas Trust, Inc. (ADAMH) and Annaly Capital Management, Inc. (NLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ADAMH vs. NLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ADAMHNLYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.07

0.31

+1.76

Correlation

The correlation between ADAMH and NLY is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

ADAMH vs. NLY - Dividend Comparison

ADAMH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, less than NLY's 13.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADAMH
Adamas Trust, Inc.
7.18%4.59%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NLY
Annaly Capital Management, Inc.
13.25%12.52%14.21%13.42%16.70%11.25%10.77%11.15%12.22%10.09%12.04%12.79%

Drawdowns

ADAMH vs. NLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ADAMH drawdown since its inception was -1.81%, smaller than the maximum NLY drawdown of -60.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ADAMH and NLY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


ADAMHNLYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-60.09%

+58.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.58%

-10.45%

+9.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.53%

-13.79%

+13.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

Volatility

ADAMH vs. NLY - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


ADAMHNLYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.93%

22.40%

-17.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

25.46%

-20.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

28.06%

-23.13%

Financials

ADAMH vs. NLY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Adamas Trust, Inc. and Annaly Capital Management, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-1.00B-500.00M0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
178.80M
0
(ADAMH) Total Revenue
(NLY) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items