PCLPX vs. CCSZX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PCLPX (PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2) and CCSZX (Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, PCLPX returned 12.24%/yr vs 8.09%/yr for CCSZX. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. PCLPX charges 0.92%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for CCSZX.

Performance

PCLPX vs. CCSZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) and Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCLPX achieves a 34.17% return, which is significantly higher than CCSZX's 27.33% return. Over the past 10 years, PCLPX has outperformed CCSZX with an annualized return of 12.24%, while CCSZX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.09% annualized return.

PCLPX

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 9.80%
• 6M: 25.22%
• YTD: 34.17%
• 1Y: 38.71%
• 3Y*: 12.16%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: 12.24%
• ALL TIME*: 5.28%

CCSZX

• 1D: -0.79%
• 1M: 6.43%
• 6M: 15.10%
• YTD: 27.33%
• 1Y: 40.67%
• 3Y*: 14.02%
• 5Y*: 11.91%
• 10Y*: 8.09%
• ALL TIME*: 2.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PCLPX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

PCLPX vs. CCSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PCLPX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2	34.17%	4.45%	5.92%	0.24%	23.04%	43.50%	-9.12%	19.39%	-12.15%	10.53%
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	27.33%	15.36%	7.11%	-6.90%	15.80%	31.34%	-1.17%	7.45%	-14.09%	1.71%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLPX and CCSZX is 0.88, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.88
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2012	0.87

The correlation between PCLPX and CCSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PCLPX vs. CCSZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCLPX

PCLPX Risk / Return Rank: 70
PCLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
PCLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
PCLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
PCLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PCLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 60

CCSZX

CCSZX Risk / Return Rank: 85
CCSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
CCSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CCSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CCSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
CCSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCLPX vs. CCSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) and Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCLPX	CCSZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.80	2.24	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.87	-0.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.40	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.32	3.17	-0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.83	10.76	-2.94

PCLPX vs. CCSZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the CCSZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLPX and CCSZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCLPX vs. CCSZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLPX drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, which is greater than CCSZX's maximum drawdown of -61.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLPX and CCSZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCLPX	CCSZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.98%	-61.34%	-5.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.49%	-11.97%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.49%	-11.97%	-3.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.53%	-27.86%	+6.33%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.87%	-34.16%	-17.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.58%	-5.27%	-1.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.50%	-31.10%	+6.60%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.61%	3.55%	+1.06%

Volatility

PCLPX vs. CCSZX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) has a higher volatility of 6.03% compared to Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund (CCSZX) at 3.54%. This indicates that PCLPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCSZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCLPX	CCSZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	3.54%	+2.49%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.83%	14.16%	+3.67%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.93%	16.93%	+3.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.59%	16.86%	+2.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	40.60%	14.89%	+25.71%

PCLPX vs. CCSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLPX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than CCSZX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCLPX vs. CCSZX - Dividend Comparison

PCLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, more than CCSZX's 2.35% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CCSZX Columbia Commodity Strategy Fund	2.35%	3.00%	8.84%	4.42%	94.73%	36.39%	0.13%	1.09%	18.52%	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%
PCLPX PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2	10.55%	1.31%	5.22%	4.65%	43.16%	74.10%	0.71%	2.39%	18.62%	12.52%	0.15%	1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCLPX and CCSZX in my portfolio?

PCLPX and CCSZX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCLPX or CCSZX?

PCLPX has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to CCSZX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLPX dropped -66.98% vs CCSZX's -61.34%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CCSZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.