PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLPX vs. PCLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLPX vs. PCLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with PCLPX having a 34.17% return and PCLIX slightly higher at 34.31%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PCLPX having a 12.24% annualized return and PCLIX not far ahead at 12.80%.


PCLPX

1D
-0.49%
1M
9.80%
6M
25.22%
YTD
34.17%
1Y
38.71%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
14.40%
10Y*
12.24%
ALL TIME*
5.28%

PCLIX

1D
-0.36%
1M
9.86%
6M
25.51%
YTD
34.31%
1Y
39.01%
3Y*
13.77%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
12.80%
ALL TIME*
5.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PCLPX vs. PCLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCLPX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2
34.17%4.45%5.92%0.24%23.04%43.50%-9.12%19.39%-12.15%10.53%
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
34.31%5.76%8.53%0.69%23.32%43.83%-9.18%19.37%-12.02%10.86%

Correlation

The correlation between PCLPX and PCLIX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 1, 2010

1.00

The correlation between PCLPX and PCLIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLPX vs. PCLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PCLPX
PCLPX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PCLPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLPX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PCLIX
PCLIX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
PCLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
PCLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PCLPX vs. PCLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCLPXPCLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

0.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.31

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.34

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.83

7.89

-0.06

PCLPX vs. PCLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCLPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the PCLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCLPX and PCLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCLPX vs. PCLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLPX drawdown since its inception was -66.98%, roughly equal to the maximum PCLIX drawdown of -66.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLPX and PCLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLPXPCLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.98%

-66.60%

-0.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.49%

-15.39%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.49%

-15.39%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.53%

-21.59%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.87%

-51.78%

-0.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.58%

-6.44%

-0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.50%

-24.00%

-0.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

4.59%

+0.02%

Volatility

PCLPX vs. PCLIX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2 (PCLPX) and PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund (PCLIX) have volatilities of 6.03% and 5.97%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLPXPCLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.03%

5.97%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.83%

17.90%

-0.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.93%

19.99%

-0.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.59%

19.48%

+0.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.60%

40.52%

+0.08%

PCLPX vs. PCLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLPX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is lower than PCLIX's 0.98% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLPX vs. PCLIX - Dividend Comparison

PCLPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.55%, more than PCLIX's 10.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCLIX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy Fund
10.37%2.45%7.50%5.06%42.60%73.41%0.77%2.46%18.58%12.63%0.16%2.22%
PCLPX
PIMCO CommoditiesPLUS Strategy I2
10.55%1.31%5.22%4.65%43.16%74.10%0.71%2.39%18.62%12.52%0.15%1.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, PCLPX and PCLIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PCLPX has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to PCLIX (5.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCLPX dropped -66.98% vs PCLIX's -66.60%.

PCLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLPX and PCLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer