PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCLC vs. SPIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCLC vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PCLC

1D
-1.83%
1M
-4.00%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPIT

1D
-1.67%
1M
4.58%
6M
28.38%
YTD
31.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCLC vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PCLC and SPIT is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2026

0.87

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCLC vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen 5Perspectives Large Growth ETF (PCLC) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PCLC vs. SPIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCLC vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCLC drawdown since its inception was -9.52%, smaller than the maximum SPIT drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCLC and SPIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCLCSPITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.52%

-12.49%

+2.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.56%

-2.65%

-2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.13%

-2.49%

-0.64%

Volatility

PCLC vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCLCSPITDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

32.27%

26.42%

+5.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.27%

26.42%

+5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.27%

26.42%

+5.85%

PCLC vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCLC has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

PCLC vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison

PCLC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPIT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PCLC and SPIT have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PCLC is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PCLC is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.

SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.48%, compared with 0.00% for PCLC.

They also come from different issuers: Polen and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for PCLC and 0.89% for SPIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCLC and SPIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer