PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCJSX vs. JIEHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PCJSX vs. JIEHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCJSX achieves a 7.66% return, which is significantly lower than JIEHX's 12.46% return.


PCJSX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.49%
YTD
7.66%
6M
6.96%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
16.81%
5Y*
9.48%
10Y*

JIEHX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.96%
YTD
12.46%
6M
11.70%
1Y
27.62%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
9.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCJSX vs. JIEHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PCJSX
Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund
7.66%14.05%16.75%23.50%-16.15%16.29%
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
12.46%20.12%15.37%18.47%-18.03%15.18%

Correlation

The correlation between PCJSX and JIEHX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021

0.97

The correlation between PCJSX and JIEHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCJSX vs. JIEHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCJSX
PCJSX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
PCJSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCJSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCJSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
PCJSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCJSX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

JIEHX
JIEHX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
JIEHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIEHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIEHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
JIEHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIEHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCJSX vs. JIEHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCJSXJIEHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.41

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.14

3.13

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.72

13.59

-4.87

PCJSX vs. JIEHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCJSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is comparable to the JIEHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCJSX and JIEHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCJSX vs. JIEHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCJSX drawdown since its inception was -22.45%, smaller than the maximum JIEHX drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCJSX and JIEHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCJSXJIEHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.45%

-32.55%

+10.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.36%

-9.18%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.76%

-16.15%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.45%

-25.70%

+3.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.51%

-0.38%

-0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.16%

-4.97%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.11%

+0.18%

Volatility

PCJSX vs. JIEHX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund (PCJSX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) have volatilities of 4.82% and 5.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCJSXJIEHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.82%

5.04%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.12%

10.57%

-0.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.66%

12.84%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

15.36%

-0.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.89%

16.47%

-1.58%

PCJSX vs. JIEHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCJSX has a 0.03% expense ratio, which is higher than JIEHX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PCJSX vs. JIEHX - Dividend Comparison

PCJSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.53%, more than JIEHX's 3.15% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
3.15%3.55%1.76%2.17%6.57%5.15%3.18%6.88%6.99%1.76%
PCJSX
Putnam RetirementReady 2065 Fund
9.53%10.26%3.90%1.39%4.88%5.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, PCJSX and JIEHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JIEHX has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to PCJSX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCJSX dropped -22.45% vs JIEHX's -32.55%.

JIEHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCJSX and JIEHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer