PCIG vs. CMDT
PCIG (Polen Capital International Growth ETF) and CMDT (PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - PCIG is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while CMDT is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Roll Select Commodity Total Return Index. PCIG is actively managed, while CMDT is passively managed. Over the past year, PCIG returned -4.20% vs 27.48% for CMDT. Their 0.02 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. PCIG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CMDT.
Performance
PCIG vs. CMDT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCIG achieves a -3.73% return, which is significantly lower than CMDT's 18.51% return.
PCIG
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.45%
- 6M
- -5.26%
- YTD
- -3.73%
- 1Y
- -4.20%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -5.18%
CMDT
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 6.05%
- 6M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 27.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.80%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 13.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.96M | $1.73M | $2.38M | |
| $54.08K | $64.30K | $56.43K |
PCIG vs. CMDT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF | -3.73% | -0.02% | -8.47% |
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 18.51% | 12.78% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCIG and CMDT is -0.09, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2024 | 0.02 |
The correlation between PCIG and CMDT shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCIG vs. CMDT — Risk / Return Rank
PCIG
CMDT
PCIG vs. CMDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) and PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCIG | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.36 | -0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 2.09 | -2.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.44 | 7.34 | -7.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCIG vs. CMDT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCIG drawdown since its inception was -23.40%, which is greater than CMDT's maximum drawdown of -13.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCIG and CMDT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCIG | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.40% | -13.23% | -10.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.69% | -13.23% | -7.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.86% | -7.13% | -5.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.58% | -2.98% | -4.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.48% | 3.76% | +5.72% |
Volatility
PCIG vs. CMDT - Volatility Comparison
Polen Capital International Growth ETF (PCIG) has a higher volatility of 6.07% compared to PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund (CMDT) at 4.11%. This indicates that PCIG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCIG | CMDT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.07% | 4.11% | +1.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.18% | 11.14% | +5.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.73% | 13.12% | +6.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 12.36% | +6.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 12.36% | +6.00% |
PCIG vs. CMDT - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCIG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than CMDT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCIG vs. CMDT - Dividend Comparison
PCIG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than CMDT's 2.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMDT PIMCO Commodity Strategy Active Exchange-Traded Fund | 2.60% | 3.04% | 8.80% | 2.71% |
PCIG Polen Capital International Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.14% | 0.36% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCIG and CMDT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PCIG has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to CMDT (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCIG dropped -23.40% vs CMDT's -13.23%.
On 1-year performance, CMDT leads with 27.48% vs -4.20% for PCIG. On fees, CMDT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CMDT has been the lower-risk option at 4.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CMDT has performed better with a 27.48% return vs -4.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CMDT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCIG.
CMDT has the higher dividend yield at 2.60%, compared with 0.15% for PCIG.
PCIG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while CMDT is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: Polen and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PCIG and 0.65% for CMDT.
CMDT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCIG and CMDT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer