PCI vs. BSCR
PCI (PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF) and BSCR (Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. PCI is actively managed, while BSCR is passively managed. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PCI charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCR.
Performance
PCI vs. BSCR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCI achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than BSCR's 1.60% return.
PCI
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BSCR
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 4.36%
- 3Y*
- 5.52%
- 5Y*
- 1.37%
- 10Y*
- —
PCI vs. BSCR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | 0.54% | 2.96% |
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 1.60% | 2.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCI and BSCR is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCI vs. BSCR — Risk / Return Rank
PCI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BSCR
PCI vs. BSCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF (PCI) and Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCI | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 2.18 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 10.47 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 46.19 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCI vs. BSCR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCI drawdown since its inception was -3.04%, smaller than the maximum BSCR drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCI and BSCR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCI | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -17.26% | +14.22% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -0.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -2.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.11% | 0.00% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.60% | -3.31% | +2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.09% | — |
Volatility
PCI vs. BSCR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCI | BSCR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.20% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 0.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.16% | 1.01% | +3.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 4.08% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.16% | 5.32% | -1.16% |
PCI vs. BSCR - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCI has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCR's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
PCI vs. BSCR - Dividend Comparison
PCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than BSCR's 4.28% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSCR Invesco BulletShares 2027 Corporate Bond ETF | 4.28% | 4.26% | 4.27% | 3.74% | 2.65% | 2.12% | 2.46% | 3.11% | 3.35% | 0.78% |
PCI PGIM Corporate Bond 5-10 Year ETF | 5.01% | 2.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCI and BSCR have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BSCR is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BSCR is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for PCI.
PCI has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 4.28% for BSCR.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for PCI and 0.10% for BSCR.
Find the right allocation for PCI and BSCR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer