PCGG vs. PCEB
PCGG (Polen Capital Global Growth ETF) and PCEB (Polen Euro High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PCGG is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Polen, while PCEB is a European High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Polen. Both are actively managed. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PCGG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for PCEB.
Performance
PCGG vs. PCEB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PCGG
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 2.17%
- 6M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- -6.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCEB
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- -0.77%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCGG vs. PCEB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | 1.34% |
PCEB Polen Euro High Yield Bond ETF | -2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCGG and PCEB is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2026 | 0.41 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCGG vs. PCEB — Risk / Return Rank
PCGG
PCEB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PCGG vs. PCEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polen Capital Global Growth ETF (PCGG) and Polen Euro High Yield Bond ETF (PCEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCGG | PCEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.69 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCGG vs. PCEB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCGG drawdown since its inception was -22.66%, which is greater than PCEB's maximum drawdown of -2.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCGG and PCEB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCGG | PCEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.66% | -2.99% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.18% | -2.29% | -9.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -1.51% | -3.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.08% | — | — |
Volatility
PCGG vs. PCEB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCGG | PCEB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.17% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.91% | 6.47% | +9.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 6.47% | +10.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 6.47% | +10.26% |
PCGG vs. PCEB - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCGG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PCEB's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCGG vs. PCEB - Dividend Comparison
PCGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PCEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.
| Position | TTM |
|---|---|
PCEB Polen Euro High Yield Bond ETF | 0.52% |
PCGG Polen Capital Global Growth ETF | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCGG and PCEB have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PCEB is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PCEB is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for PCGG.
PCEB has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for PCGG.
PCGG is categorized as Global Equities, while PCEB is European High Yield Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for PCGG and 0.55% for PCEB.
Find the right allocation for PCGG and PCEB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer