PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCG vs. EGP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PCG vs. EGP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PG&E Corporation (PCG) and EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCG achieves a 7.46% return, which is significantly lower than EGP's 19.57% return. Over the past 10 years, PCG has underperformed EGP with an annualized return of -11.79%, while EGP has yielded a comparatively higher 14.61% annualized return.


PCG

1D
-0.06%
1M
2.56%
6M
8.95%
YTD
7.46%
1Y
29.30%
3Y*
-0.40%
5Y*
10.99%
10Y*
-11.79%

EGP

1D
-0.38%
1M
4.21%
6M
15.72%
YTD
19.57%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
8.84%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
14.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCG vs. EGP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCG
PG&E Corporation
7.46%-19.72%12.25%10.95%33.94%-2.57%14.63%-54.23%-47.02%-24.51%
EGP
EastGroup Properties, Inc.
19.57%14.85%-9.81%27.69%-33.07%68.44%6.76%48.23%6.95%23.34%

Correlation

The correlation between PCG and EGP is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 1992

0.24

The correlation between PCG and EGP shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.36 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PCG:

$37.81B

EGP:

$11.27B

EPS

PCG:

$1.31

EGP:

$3.71

PE Ratio

PCG:

13.11

EGP:

56.53

PS Ratio

PCG:

1.50

EGP:

20.47

PB Ratio

PCG:

1.01

EGP:

3.14

Total Revenue (TTM)

PCG:

$25.83B

EGP:

$546.91M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PCG:

$11.87B

EGP:

$237.02M

EBITDA (TTM)

PCG:

$10.55B

EGP:

$628.87M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCG vs. EGP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCG
PCG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCG Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCG Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

EGP
EGP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
EGP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EGP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
EGP Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
EGP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
EGP Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCG vs. EGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PG&E Corporation (PCG) and EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCGEGPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.27

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

4.42

-2.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.70

11.53

-7.83

PCG vs. EGP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is lower than the EGP Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCG and EGP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCG vs. EGP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCG drawdown since its inception was -94.65%, which is greater than EGP's maximum drawdown of -59.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCG and EGP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCGEGPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-94.65%

-59.55%

-35.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.82%

-6.83%

-9.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-39.63%

-22.37%

-17.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.63%

-38.08%

-1.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.65%

-38.10%

-56.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-75.40%

-2.33%

-73.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.57%

-9.50%

-17.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.63%

2.61%

+5.02%

Volatility

PCG vs. EGP - Volatility Comparison

PG&E Corporation (PCG) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to EastGroup Properties, Inc. (EGP) at 6.31%. This indicates that PCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCGEGPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

6.31%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.40%

12.90%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.40%

18.64%

+7.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.05%

23.41%

+4.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

59.57%

26.34%

+33.23%

Dividends

PCG vs. EGP - Dividend Comparison

PCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, less than EGP's 2.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EGP
EastGroup Properties, Inc.
2.96%3.31%3.33%2.75%3.17%1.57%2.23%2.22%2.97%2.85%3.30%4.21%
PCG
PG&E Corporation
1.02%0.78%0.27%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%3.46%3.17%3.42%

Financials

PCG vs. EGP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PG&E Corporation and EastGroup Properties, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
6.88B
22.00K
(PCG) Total Revenue
(EGP) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


PCG and EGP have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCG has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to EGP (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCG dropped -94.65% vs EGP's -59.55%.

EGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCG and EGP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer