PCFAX vs. QRSVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PCFAX (PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund) and QRSVX (FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, PCFAX returned 8.88%/yr vs 12.32%/yr for QRSVX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PCFAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for QRSVX.

Performance

PCFAX vs. QRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCFAX achieves a 19.22% return, which is significantly lower than QRSVX's 26.22% return.

PCFAX

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.78%
• YTD: 19.22%
• 6M: 16.75%
• 1Y: 38.23%
• 3Y*: 22.38%
• 5Y*: 8.88%
• 10Y*: 13.81%

QRSVX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 4.41%
• YTD: 26.22%
• 6M: 24.08%
• 1Y: 37.39%
• 3Y*: 21.98%
• 5Y*: 12.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCFAX vs. QRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	19.22%	6.44%	20.44%	17.64%	-12.75%	38.96%	0.55%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	26.22%	13.37%	10.72%	16.04%	-9.14%	23.16%	2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between PCFAX and QRSVX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.90
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020	0.89

The correlation between PCFAX and QRSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PCFAX vs. QRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCFAX

PCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 74
PCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
PCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
PCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

QRSVX

QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 87
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCFAX vs. QRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PCFAX	QRSVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.60	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.86	-0.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.46	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.53	5.00	-0.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.62	17.66	-3.04

PCFAX vs. QRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the QRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCFAX and QRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PCFAX vs. QRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCFAX drawdown since its inception was -52.29%, which is greater than QRSVX's maximum drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCFAX and QRSVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCFAX	QRSVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.29%	-20.59%	-31.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.94%	-7.93%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.18%	-18.91%	-9.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.91%	-20.59%	-8.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.29%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.85%	0.00%	-1.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.08%	-4.85%	-4.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	2.24%	+0.52%

Volatility

PCFAX vs. QRSVX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund (PCFAX) has a higher volatility of 5.71% compared to FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) at 4.61%. This indicates that PCFAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCFAX	QRSVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.71%	4.61%	+1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	10.68%	+2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.11%	15.29%	+2.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.14%	17.48%	+5.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.90%	17.47%	+7.43%

PCFAX vs. QRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PCFAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than QRSVX's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

PCFAX vs. QRSVX - Dividend Comparison

PCFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than QRSVX's 3.52% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCFAX PIMCO RAE PLUS Small Fund	4.11%	2.26%	6.30%	1.99%	13.66%	235.35%	18.04%	2.29%	12.48%	8.98%	0.00%	26.20%
QRSVX FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class	3.52%	4.45%	4.86%	2.56%	2.07%	1.66%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PCFAX and QRSVX in my portfolio?

PCFAX and QRSVX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PCFAX or QRSVX?

PCFAX has higher volatility (5.71%) compared to QRSVX (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCFAX dropped -52.29% vs QRSVX's -20.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.