PCF vs. CICVX
PCF (High Income Securities Fund) and CICVX (Calamos Convertible Fund) are both Convertible Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, PCF returned 5.49%/yr vs 11.45%/yr for CICVX. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
PCF vs. CICVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCF achieves a -7.81% return, which is significantly lower than CICVX's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, PCF has underperformed CICVX with an annualized return of 5.49%, while CICVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.
PCF
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -4.01%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- -5.80%
- 3Y*
- 5.45%
- 5Y*
- -0.68%
- 10Y*
- 5.49%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.04%
CICVX
- 1D
- 3.16%
- 1M
- -3.18%
- 6M
- 11.47%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 1Y
- 29.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.45%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $275.34K | $274.09K | $326.49K |
PCF vs. CICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCF High Income Securities Fund | -7.81% | 5.31% | 16.66% | 10.45% | -15.56% | 11.44% | 8.13% | 4.22% | 5.46% | 14.58% |
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund | 17.72% | 19.03% | 9.94% | 10.95% | -21.02% | 5.36% | 48.84% | 19.51% | 0.59% | 14.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCF and CICVX is 0.37, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.33 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 1997 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCF vs. CICVX — Risk / Return Rank
PCF
CICVX
PCF vs. CICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for High Income Securities Fund (PCF) and Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCF | CICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.92 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.28 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.60 | 2.73 | -3.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.26 | 10.26 | -11.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCF vs. CICVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCF drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, which is greater than CICVX's maximum drawdown of -49.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCF and CICVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCF | CICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -49.33% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.73% | -10.15% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.74% | -14.79% | +1.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.06% | -27.17% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.13% | -27.17% | -17.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.67% | -7.31% | -2.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.48% | -17.40% | +6.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.08% | 2.69% | +2.39% |
Volatility
PCF vs. CICVX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for High Income Securities Fund (PCF) is 3.77%, while Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that PCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCF | CICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.77% | 6.18% | -2.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.55% | 14.15% | -3.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | 17.06% | -5.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.05% | 13.39% | +2.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.54% | 13.12% | +4.42% |
Dividends
PCF vs. CICVX - Dividend Comparison
PCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.30%, more than CICVX's 10.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund | 10.59% | 12.51% | 1.83% | 2.48% | 0.94% | 15.90% | 7.74% | 1.39% | 16.75% | 4.55% | 3.43% | 5.41% |
PCF High Income Securities Fund | 13.30% | 11.57% | 11.29% | 11.29% | 13.48% | 10.82% | 11.46% | 3.29% | 6.88% | 3.97% | 4.52% | 5.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCF and CICVX have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CICVX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to PCF (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCF dropped -53.82% vs CICVX's -49.33%.
CICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PCF and CICVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer