CICVX vs. FICVX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX).
CICVX is managed by Calamos. It was launched on Jun 25, 1997. FICVX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009.
Performance
CICVX vs. FICVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CICVX vs. FICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund | 0.23% | 19.03% | 9.94% | 10.95% | -21.02% | 5.36% | 48.84% | 19.51% | 0.59% | 14.21% |
FICVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I | 1.37% | 18.28% | 8.11% | 11.39% | -15.38% | 9.93% | 42.46% | 28.58% | -1.31% | 9.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CICVX achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than FICVX's 1.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CICVX has underperformed FICVX with an annualized return of 10.31%, while FICVX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.11% annualized return.
CICVX
- 1D
- -1.77%
- 1M
- -6.19%
- YTD
- 0.23%
- 6M
- 1.71%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- 12.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.59%
- 10Y*
- 10.31%
FICVX
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -5.61%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 24.52%
- 3Y*
- 11.55%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 11.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CICVX vs. FICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CICVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FICVX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CICVX vs. FICVX — Risk / Return Rank
CICVX
FICVX
CICVX vs. FICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CICVX | FICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.54 | 1.55 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 2.11 | -0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.29 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 2.87 | -0.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.81 | 10.86 | -1.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CICVX | FICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54 | 1.55 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 | 0.40 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | 0.83 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.29 | 0.95 | -0.65 |
Correlation
The correlation between CICVX and FICVX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CICVX vs. FICVX - Dividend Comparison
CICVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.57%, more than FICVX's 11.23% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CICVX Calamos Convertible Fund | 12.57% | 12.51% | 1.83% | 2.48% | 0.94% | 15.90% | 7.74% | 1.39% | 16.75% | 4.55% | 3.43% | 5.41% |
FICVX Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I | 11.23% | 11.38% | 2.02% | 2.12% | 3.73% | 20.65% | 10.73% | 3.28% | 9.85% | 4.09% | 4.90% | 10.39% |
Drawdowns
CICVX vs. FICVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CICVX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than FICVX's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICVX and FICVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CICVX | FICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.33% | -25.06% | -24.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.89% | -7.75% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.17% | -24.20% | -2.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.17% | -25.06% | -2.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.70% | -6.80% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.58% | -5.68% | -11.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.20% | 2.05% | +0.15% |
Volatility
CICVX vs. FICVX - Volatility Comparison
Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) have volatilities of 6.16% and 6.34%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CICVX | FICVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.16% | 6.34% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.86% | 12.08% | -0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.31% | 15.65% | -0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.64% | 13.36% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.69% | 13.50% | -0.81% |