PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CICVX vs. FICVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CICVX vs. FICVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CICVX having a 24.54% return and FICVX slightly lower at 23.97%. Over the past 10 years, CICVX has underperformed FICVX with an annualized return of 12.39%, while FICVX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.15% annualized return.


CICVX

1D
1.09%
1M
7.09%
YTD
24.54%
6M
24.75%
1Y
45.24%
3Y*
20.34%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
12.39%

FICVX

1D
0.90%
1M
6.54%
YTD
23.97%
6M
24.40%
1Y
43.85%
3Y*
19.15%
5Y*
9.16%
10Y*
13.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CICVX vs. FICVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
24.54%19.03%9.94%10.95%-21.02%5.36%48.84%19.51%0.59%14.21%
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
23.97%18.28%8.11%11.39%-15.38%9.93%42.46%28.58%-1.31%9.03%

Correlation

The correlation between CICVX and FICVX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2009

0.93

The correlation between CICVX and FICVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CICVX vs. FICVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CICVX
CICVX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

FICVX
FICVX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CICVX vs. FICVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) and Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CICVXFICVXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.12

3.01

+0.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.01

3.88

+0.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.52

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.99

6.22

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

23.32

24.47

-1.15

CICVX vs. FICVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CICVX Sharpe Ratio is 3.12, which is comparable to the FICVX Sharpe Ratio of 3.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CICVX and FICVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CICVXFICVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.12

3.01

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

0.68

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

0.97

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

1.03

-0.68

Drawdowns

CICVX vs. FICVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CICVX drawdown since its inception was -49.33%, which is greater than FICVX's maximum drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CICVX and FICVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CICVXFICVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.33%

-25.06%

-24.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.70%

-7.14%

-0.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.79%

-18.88%

+4.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-24.20%

-2.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.17%

-25.06%

-2.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.48%

-5.63%

-11.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.98%

1.82%

+0.16%

Volatility

CICVX vs. FICVX - Volatility Comparison

Calamos Convertible Fund (CICVX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) at 4.81%. This indicates that CICVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FICVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CICVXFICVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

4.81%

+0.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.12%

11.85%

+0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.83%

14.83%

0.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.87%

13.48%

-0.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.88%

13.64%

-0.76%

CICVX vs. FICVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CICVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FICVX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

CICVX vs. FICVX - Dividend Comparison

CICVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.12%, more than FICVX's 8.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CICVX
Calamos Convertible Fund
10.12%12.51%1.83%2.48%0.94%15.90%7.74%1.39%16.75%4.55%3.43%5.41%
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
8.91%11.38%2.02%2.12%3.73%20.65%10.73%3.28%9.85%4.09%4.90%10.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CICVX and FICVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CICVX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to FICVX (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CICVX dropped -49.33% vs FICVX's -25.06%.

CICVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.12 vs 3.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CICVX and FICVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer