PCEF vs. THRV
PCEF (Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF) and THRV (Prospera Income ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. PCEF is passively managed, while THRV is actively managed. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PCEF charges 2.71%/yr vs 1.80%/yr for THRV.
Performance
PCEF vs. THRV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PCEF achieves a 6.59% return, which is significantly higher than THRV's 2.43% return.
PCEF
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -0.05%
- 6M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 1Y
- 11.12%
- 3Y*
- 13.06%
- 5Y*
- 4.70%
- 10Y*
- 7.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.96%
THRV
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.83M | $2.51M | $2.37M | |
| $173.58K | $102.00K | $97.25K |
PCEF vs. THRV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 6.59% | 1.91% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 2.43% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between PCEF and THRV is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2025 | 0.60 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PCEF vs. THRV — Risk / Return Rank
PCEF
THRV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PCEF vs. THRV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF (PCEF) and Prospera Income ETF (THRV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PCEF | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.07 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PCEF vs. THRV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PCEF drawdown since its inception was -38.64%, which is greater than THRV's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCEF and THRV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PCEF | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.64% | -1.50% | -37.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.25% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | 0.00% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.44% | -0.42% | -4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.83% | — | — |
Volatility
PCEF vs. THRV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PCEF | THRV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.25% | 2.88% | +6.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.55% | 2.88% | +8.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.31% | 2.88% | +10.43% |
PCEF vs. THRV - Expense Ratio Comparison
PCEF has a 2.71% expense ratio, which is higher than THRV's 1.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PCEF vs. THRV - Dividend Comparison
PCEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.58%, more than THRV's 6.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCEF Invesco CEF Income Composite ETF | 7.58% | 7.96% | 8.79% | 9.86% | 8.93% | 6.67% | 7.54% | 7.12% | 8.21% | 6.96% | 7.72% | 9.18% |
THRV Prospera Income ETF | 6.07% | 1.67% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PCEF and THRV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, THRV is cheaper at 1.80% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
THRV is cheaper with a 1.80% expense ratio, compared with 2.71% for PCEF.
PCEF has the higher dividend yield at 7.58%, compared with 6.07% for THRV.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Prospera. Their fees differ too: 2.71% for PCEF and 1.80% for THRV.
Find the right allocation for PCEF and THRV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer