PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PCB vs. LKFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

PCB vs. LKFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PCB Bancorp (PCB) and Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCB achieves a 27.70% return, which is significantly higher than LKFN's 9.25% return. Over the past 10 years, PCB has outperformed LKFN with an annualized return of 12.56%, while LKFN has yielded a comparatively lower 9.98% annualized return.


PCB

1D
1.72%
1M
10.59%
YTD
27.70%
6M
23.31%
1Y
37.21%
3Y*
25.19%
5Y*
15.87%
10Y*
12.56%

LKFN

1D
1.68%
1M
2.29%
YTD
9.25%
6M
5.03%
1Y
5.74%
3Y*
10.87%
5Y*
2.51%
10Y*
9.98%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PCB vs. LKFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PCB
PCB Bancorp
27.70%11.21%14.55%8.85%-17.05%122.72%-39.25%12.06%1.69%20.28%
LKFN
Lakeland Financial Corporation
9.25%-14.25%8.68%-7.78%-7.00%52.73%12.55%24.99%-15.41%4.31%

Correlation

The correlation between PCB and LKFN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2014

0.43

Over the past year, PCB and LKFN have become more correlated (0.70) than their long-term average of 0.43, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PCB:

$386.43M

LKFN:

$1.56B

EPS

PCB:

$2.82

LKFN:

$4.27

PE Ratio

PCB:

9.61

LKFN:

14.36

PEG Ratio

PCB:

3.53

LKFN:

7.12

PS Ratio

PCB:

1.86

LKFN:

3.71

PB Ratio

PCB:

1.18

LKFN:

2.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

PCB:

$208.73M

LKFN:

$425.24M

Gross Profit (TTM)

PCB:

$86.42M

LKFN:

$267.89M

EBITDA (TTM)

PCB:

$43.83M

LKFN:

$137.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PCB vs. LKFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCB
PCB Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
PCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCB Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
PCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

LKFN
LKFN Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LKFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LKFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
LKFN Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
LKFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LKFN Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCB vs. LKFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PCB Bancorp (PCB) and Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PCBLKFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.06

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

0.31

+2.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.39

0.52

+6.87

PCB vs. LKFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the LKFN Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCB and LKFN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PCB vs. LKFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCB drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, roughly equal to the maximum LKFN drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCB and LKFN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PCBLKFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.93%

-61.30%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.39%

-18.57%

+7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.84%

-31.66%

+8.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.49%

-47.35%

+0.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-60.93%

-47.35%

-13.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-17.53%

+17.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.34%

-14.56%

-3.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.05%

11.06%

-6.01%

Volatility

PCB vs. LKFN - Volatility Comparison

PCB Bancorp (PCB) and Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) have volatilities of 6.69% and 6.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PCBLKFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.69%

6.55%

+0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.82%

17.30%

+0.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.01%

25.52%

+0.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.83%

30.15%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.44%

31.22%

+2.22%

Dividends

PCB vs. LKFN - Dividend Comparison

PCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, less than LKFN's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LKFN
Lakeland Financial Corporation
3.33%3.51%2.79%2.82%2.19%1.70%2.24%2.37%2.49%1.75%1.53%2.03%
PCB
PCB Bancorp
3.10%3.70%3.56%3.74%3.39%2.00%3.96%1.45%0.77%0.77%0.92%0.70%

Financials

PCB vs. LKFN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PCB Bancorp and Lakeland Financial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


20.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M100.00M120.00M20222023202420252026
48.83M
104.92M
(PCB) Total Revenue
(LKFN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PCB vs. LKFN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PCB Bancorp and Lakeland Financial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202220232024202520260
64.5%
Portfolio components
PCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PCB Bancorp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 48.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LKFN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lakeland Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 67.71M and revenue of 104.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.

PCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PCB Bancorp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 48.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

LKFN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lakeland Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 32.56M and revenue of 104.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

PCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, PCB Bancorp reported a net income of 10.65M and revenue of 48.83M, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.

LKFN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lakeland Financial Corporation reported a net income of 26.48M and revenue of 104.92M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


PCB and LKFN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PCB has higher volatility (6.69%) compared to LKFN (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PCB dropped -60.93% vs LKFN's -61.30%.

PCB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PCB and LKFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer