LKFN vs. ALLY

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LKFN (Lakeland Financial Corporation) and ALLY (Ally Financial Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Financial Services sector — LKFN in Banks - Regional, ALLY in Credit Services. Over the past 10 years, LKFN returned 9.05%/yr vs 12.13%/yr for ALLY. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

LKFN vs. ALLY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) and Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LKFN achieves a 7.18% return, which is significantly higher than ALLY's -5.59% return. Over the past 10 years, LKFN has underperformed ALLY with an annualized return of 9.05%, while ALLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.13% annualized return.

LKFN

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -2.07%
• YTD: 7.18%
• 6M: 5.03%
• 1Y: 5.27%
• 3Y*: 6.85%
• 5Y*: 2.26%
• 10Y*: 9.05%

ALLY

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -2.86%
• YTD: -5.59%
• 6M: 3.84%
• 1Y: 23.25%
• 3Y*: 18.20%
• 5Y*: -2.05%
• 10Y*: 12.13%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LKFN vs. ALLY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LKFN Lakeland Financial Corporation	7.18%	-14.25%	8.68%	-7.78%	-7.00%	52.73%	12.55%	24.99%	-15.41%	4.31%
ALLY Ally Financial Inc.	-5.59%	29.92%	6.37%	49.22%	-46.89%	36.04%	20.56%	37.94%	-20.67%	56.05%

Correlation

The correlation between LKFN and ALLY is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2014	0.48

The correlation between LKFN and ALLY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap LKFN : $1.53B ALLY : $13.21B
EPS LKFN : $4.27 ALLY : $4.45
PE Ratio LKFN : 14.08 ALLY : 9.47
PS Ratio LKFN : 3.64 ALLY : 0.84
PB Ratio LKFN : 2.05 ALLY : 0.99
Total Revenue (TTM) LKFN : $425.24M ALLY : $15.65B
Gross Profit (TTM) LKFN : $267.89M ALLY : $7.65B
EBITDA (TTM) LKFN : $137.10M ALLY : $2.77B

Return for Risk

LKFN vs. ALLY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LKFN

LKFN Risk / Return Rank: 43
LKFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
LKFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
LKFN Omega Ratio Rank: 39
LKFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
LKFN Martin Ratio Rank: 44

ALLY

ALLY Risk / Return Rank: 62
ALLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
ALLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
ALLY Omega Ratio Rank: 58
ALLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
ALLY Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LKFN vs. ALLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) and Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LKFN	ALLY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	0.80	-0.59
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	1.28	-0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.16	-0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	1.05	-0.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.35	2.62	-2.27
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LKFN vs. ALLY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LKFN Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the ALLY Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LKFN and ALLY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LKFN	ALLY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	0.80	-0.59
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.08	-0.05	+0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.31	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.19	+0.11

Drawdowns

LKFN vs. ALLY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LKFN drawdown since its inception was -61.30%, smaller than the maximum ALLY drawdown of -66.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LKFN and ALLY.

Drawdown Indicators

	LKFN	ALLY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.30%	-66.24%	+4.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.57%	-23.04%	+4.47%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.66%	-31.60%	-0.06%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.35%	-58.08%	+10.73%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.35%	-66.24%	+18.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-19.09%	-11.44%	-7.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.55%	-20.38%	+5.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.84%	9.21%	+1.63%

Volatility

LKFN vs. ALLY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lakeland Financial Corporation (LKFN) is 6.98%, while Ally Financial Inc. (ALLY) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that LKFN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALLY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LKFN	ALLY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.98%	8.21%	-1.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.79%	21.53%	-4.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.47%	29.26%	-3.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.11%	38.46%	-8.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.25%	39.57%	-8.32%

Dividends

LKFN vs. ALLY - Dividend Comparison

LKFN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.39%, more than ALLY's 2.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ALLY Ally Financial Inc.	2.85%	2.65%	3.33%	3.44%	4.91%	1.85%	2.13%	2.23%	2.47%	1.37%	0.84%	0.00%
LKFN Lakeland Financial Corporation	3.39%	3.51%	2.79%	2.82%	2.19%	1.70%	2.24%	2.37%	2.49%	1.75%	1.53%	2.03%

Financials

LKFN vs. ALLY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lakeland Financial Corporation and Ally Financial Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

LKFN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lakeland Financial Corporation reported a gross profit of 67.71M and revenue of 104.92M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 64.5%.

ALLY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ally Financial Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 3.89B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.0%.

LKFN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lakeland Financial Corporation reported an operating income of 32.56M and revenue of 104.92M, resulting in an operating margin of 31.0%.

ALLY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ally Financial Inc. reported an operating income of 400.00M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.3%.

LKFN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Lakeland Financial Corporation reported a net income of 26.48M and revenue of 104.92M, resulting in a net margin of 25.2%.

ALLY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ally Financial Inc. reported a net income of 319.00M and revenue of 3.89B, resulting in a net margin of 8.2%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LKFN and ALLY in my portfolio?

LKFN and ALLY have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LKFN or ALLY?

ALLY has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to LKFN (6.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LKFN dropped -61.30% vs ALLY's -66.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ALLY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.