PortfoliosLab logo
PCB vs. NU
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between PCB and NU is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

PCB vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PCB Bancorp (PCB) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

PCB:

1.12

NU:

-0.03

Sortino Ratio

PCB:

1.70

NU:

0.29

Omega Ratio

PCB:

1.20

NU:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

PCB:

0.34

NU:

-0.04

Martin Ratio

PCB:

3.89

NU:

-0.07

Ulcer Index

PCB:

8.73%

NU:

19.78%

Daily Std Dev

PCB:

31.76%

NU:

48.11%

Max Drawdown

PCB:

-100.00%

NU:

-72.07%

Current Drawdown

PCB:

-100.00%

NU:

-24.42%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

PCB:

$278.46M

NU:

$57.94B

EPS

PCB:

$1.94

NU:

$0.44

PE Ratio

PCB:

9.97

NU:

27.30

PS Ratio

PCB:

2.82

NU:

10.26

PB Ratio

PCB:

0.93

NU:

6.73

Total Revenue (TTM)

PCB:

$122.66M

NU:

$11.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

PCB:

$122.66M

NU:

$5.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

PCB:

$31.33M

NU:

$3.09B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCB achieves a -2.53% return, which is significantly lower than NU's 15.93% return.


PCB

YTD

-2.53%

1M

0.07%

6M

-8.20%

1Y

33.43%

3Y*

3.26%

5Y*

21.00%

10Y*

-57.99%

NU

YTD

15.93%

1M

-2.67%

6M

-4.15%

1Y

1.09%

3Y*

46.62%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PCB Bancorp

Nu Holdings Ltd.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

PCB vs. NU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of PCB is 7878
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of PCB is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of PCB is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of PCB is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of PCB is 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of PCB is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NU
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NU is 4747
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NU is 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NU is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NU is 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NU is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NU is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

PCB vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PCB Bancorp (PCB) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current PCB Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is higher than the NU Sharpe Ratio of -0.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCB and NU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

PCB vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

PCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.86%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCB
PCB Bancorp
4.86%4.45%3.74%3.39%2.00%3.96%1.45%0.77%0.77%0.84%0.00%
NU
Nu Holdings Ltd.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PCB vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCB drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than NU's maximum drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCB and NU.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

PCB vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PCB Bancorp (PCB) is 7.80%, while Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a volatility of 9.93%. This indicates that PCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

PCB vs. NU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between PCB Bancorp and Nu Holdings Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50B20212022202320242025
46.89M
3.15B
(PCB) Total Revenue
(NU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

PCB vs. NU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PCB Bancorp and Nu Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
40.6%
(PCB) Gross Margin
(NU) Gross Margin
PCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, PCB Bancorp reported a gross profit of 46.89M and revenue of 46.89M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 1.28B and revenue of 3.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.6%.

PCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, PCB Bancorp reported an operating income of 46.02M and revenue of 46.89M, resulting in an operating margin of 98.1%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 795.07M and revenue of 3.15B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.3%.

PCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, PCB Bancorp reported a net income of 7.74M and revenue of 46.89M, resulting in a net margin of 16.5%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2025, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 557.20M and revenue of 3.15B, resulting in a net margin of 17.7%.