PCB vs. NU

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PCB Bancorp (PCB) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU).

Performance

PCB vs. NU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PCB Bancorp (PCB) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PCB vs. NU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PCB PCB Bancorp	4.89%	11.21%	14.55%	8.85%	-17.05%	2.00%
NU Nu Holdings Ltd.	-14.16%	61.58%	24.37%	104.67%	-56.61%	-9.20%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PCB : $320.16M NU : $70.65B
EPS PCB : $2.62 NU : $0.58
PE Ratio PCB : 8.60 NU : 24.58
PEG Ratio PCB : 3.75 NU : 0.38
PS Ratio PCB : 1.56 NU : 4.58
PB Ratio PCB : 1.00 NU : 6.26
Total Revenue (TTM) PCB : $206.69M NU : $15.40B
Gross Profit (TTM) PCB : $83.40M NU : $6.61B
EBITDA (TTM) PCB : $42.61M NU : $3.94B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PCB achieves a 4.89% return, which is significantly higher than NU's -14.16% return.

PCB

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 4.89%
• 6M: 9.15%
• 1Y: 24.94%
• 3Y*: 20.77%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: 10.81%

NU

• 1D: 6.37%
• 1M: -4.07%
• YTD: -14.16%
• 6M: -10.24%
• 1Y: 40.33%
• 3Y*: 44.53%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PCB vs. NU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PCB

PCB Risk / Return Rank: 71
PCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
PCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
PCB Omega Ratio Rank: 62
PCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
PCB Martin Ratio Rank: 75

NU

NU Risk / Return Rank: 72
NU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
NU Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
NU Omega Ratio Rank: 69
NU Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
NU Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PCB vs. NU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PCB Bancorp (PCB) and Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PCB	NU	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.88	1.01	-0.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.44	1.53	-0.08
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	1.20	-0.04
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.14	1.39	+0.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.50	4.16	+0.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PCB vs. NU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PCB Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is comparable to the NU Sharpe Ratio of 1.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PCB and NU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PCB	NU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88	1.01	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.41	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.14	+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between PCB and NU is 0.20, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PCB vs. NU - Dividend Comparison

PCB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, while NU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PCB PCB Bancorp	3.65%	3.70%	3.56%	3.74%	3.39%	2.00%	3.96%	1.45%	0.77%	0.77%	0.92%	0.70%
NU Nu Holdings Ltd.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PCB vs. NU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PCB drawdown since its inception was -60.93%, smaller than the maximum NU drawdown of -72.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PCB and NU.

Drawdown Indicators

	PCB	NU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.93%	-72.07%	+11.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.39%	-27.99%	+16.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-46.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-60.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.22%	-23.40%	+18.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.67%	-29.90%	+11.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.42%	9.34%	-3.92%

Volatility

PCB vs. NU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PCB Bancorp (PCB) is 6.40%, while Nu Holdings Ltd. (NU) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that PCB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PCB	NU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.40%	12.28%	-5.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.78%	27.59%	-8.81%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	28.36%	39.99%	-11.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.92%	59.14%	-29.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	33.31%	59.14%	-25.83%

Financials

PCB vs. NU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between PCB Bancorp and Nu Holdings Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PCB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PCB Bancorp reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 49.87M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

NU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a gross profit of 2.09B and revenue of 4.70B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

PCB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PCB Bancorp reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 49.87M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

NU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.9%.

PCB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, PCB Bancorp reported a net income of 9.24M and revenue of 49.87M, resulting in a net margin of 18.5%.

NU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Nu Holdings Ltd. reported a net income of 892.38M and revenue of 4.70B, resulting in a net margin of 19.0%.