PBW vs. SLYG

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

PBW (Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF) and SLYG (SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds - PBW tracks the The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX) while SLYG tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PBW returned 7.70%/yr vs 11.05%/yr for SLYG. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PBW charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SLYG.

Performance

PBW vs. SLYG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PBW achieves a 12.09% return, which is significantly lower than SLYG's 22.76% return. Over the past 10 years, PBW has underperformed SLYG with an annualized return of 7.70%, while SLYG has yielded a comparatively higher 11.05% annualized return.

PBW

• 1D: -3.46%
• 1M: -14.83%
• 6M: -0.86%
• YTD: 12.09%
• 1Y: 55.86%
• 3Y*: -4.93%
• 5Y*: -14.27%
• 10Y*: 7.70%

SLYG

• 1D: -0.98%
• 1M: 2.26%
• 6M: 16.87%
• YTD: 22.76%
• 1Y: 27.99%
• 3Y*: 15.03%
• 5Y*: 7.21%
• 10Y*: 11.05%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PBW vs. SLYG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	12.09%	53.96%	-30.77%	-20.03%	-44.55%	-29.86%	204.82%	62.58%	-14.11%	39.92%
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF	22.76%	5.20%	9.38%	17.27%	-21.26%	22.42%	19.48%	20.97%	-4.20%	14.62%

Correlation

The correlation between PBW and SLYG is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.68
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 2005	0.74

The correlation between PBW and SLYG shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PBW vs. SLYG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PBW	SLYG
Industrials	28.0%	18.8%
Basic Materials	13.5%	2.9%
Energy	12.9%	4.5%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	10.9%
Technology	9.9%	17.5%
Utilities	8.4%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	3.0%
Financial Services	1.3%	14.2%
Communication Services	-	2.8%
Healthcare	-	17.0%
Real Estate	-	6.5%

Return for Risk

PBW vs. SLYG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PBW

PBW Risk / Return Rank: 45
PBW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
PBW Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
PBW Omega Ratio Rank: 41
PBW Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
PBW Martin Ratio Rank: 45

SLYG

SLYG Risk / Return Rank: 65
SLYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
SLYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
SLYG Omega Ratio Rank: 55
SLYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
SLYG Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PBW vs. SLYG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) and SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PBW	SLYG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.30	1.57	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	2.35	-0.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.27	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.06	3.09	-1.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.82	10.79	-4.97

PBW vs. SLYG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PBW Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the SLYG Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PBW and SLYG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PBW vs. SLYG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PBW drawdown since its inception was -89.02%, which is greater than SLYG's maximum drawdown of -62.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PBW and SLYG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PBW	SLYG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.02%	-62.92%	-26.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.22%	-9.10%	-18.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-68.04%	-27.39%	-40.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.50%	-29.18%	-55.32%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.02%	-41.86%	-47.16%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-71.75%	-3.32%	-68.43%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-62.92%	-14.85%	-48.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.62%	2.60%	+7.02%

Volatility

PBW vs. SLYG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF (PBW) has a higher volatility of 14.18% compared to SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF (SLYG) at 5.22%. This indicates that PBW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLYG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PBW	SLYG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	14.18%	5.22%	+8.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.08%	13.04%	+19.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	43.18%	17.96%	+25.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	43.54%	21.55%	+21.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.09%	22.71%	+16.38%

PBW vs. SLYG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PBW has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SLYG's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

PBW vs. SLYG - Dividend Comparison

PBW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, more than SLYG's 0.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PBW Invesco WilderHill Clean Energy ETF	1.39%	0.79%	2.84%	3.68%	4.21%	1.71%	0.44%	1.45%	2.04%	1.28%	2.68%	1.53%
SLYG SPDR S&P 600 Small Cap Growth ETF	0.66%	0.86%	1.22%	1.18%	1.18%	0.68%	0.71%	1.08%	1.06%	4.74%	1.13%	5.75%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PBW and SLYG in my portfolio?

PBW and SLYG have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PBW or SLYG?

PBW has higher volatility (14.18%) compared to SLYG (5.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PBW dropped -89.02% vs SLYG's -62.92%.

Which ETF is better, PBW or SLYG?

On 10-year performance, SLYG leads with 11.05% vs 7.70% for PBW. On fees, SLYG is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SLYG has been the lower-risk option at 5.22%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PBW or SLYG?

Over the 10-year period, SLYG has performed better with a 11.05% return vs 7.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PBW or SLYG?

SLYG is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PBW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PBW or SLYG?

PBW has the higher dividend yield at 1.39%, compared with 0.66% for SLYG.

What is the main difference between PBW and SLYG?

PBW tracks The WilderHill Clean Energy Index (AMEX), while SLYG tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PBW and 0.15% for SLYG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SLYG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.